• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.

Classic Whipping Scenes Only

Go to CruxDreams.com
Giant Pedro said:
With AI coming on we will be able to see scenes like this reworked to more realistic images with the victim naked. Oh yeah.
Click to expand...
This scene was not realistic, even in the 18th Century it was appreciated that driving dirty cloth into wounds could prove fatal, hence before battle the British soldier must don a clean shirt, and even women were whipped on bare flesh in the penal camps.
 
twonines said:
This scene was not realistic, even in the 18th Century it was appreciated that driving dirty cloth into wounds could prove fatal, hence before battle the British soldier must don a clean shirt, and even women were whipped on bare flesh in the penal camps.
Click to expand...
It’s only realistic when seeking to be approved to a more general movie classification!
 
twonines said:
This scene was not realistic, even in the 18th Century it was appreciated that driving dirty cloth into wounds could prove fatal, hence before battle the British soldier must don a clean shirt, and even women were whipped on bare flesh in the penal camps.
Click to expand...
They do address this in the scene. The officer orders her to strip for exactly this reason and she stubbornly refuses. Then he's too impatient to press the issue further
 
mark sessnatz said:
Mary Bryant was actually an Aussie production, that's the difference lol. @Loinclothslave will tell you all you need to know about their sensibilities :p
Click to expand...
Even Midnight Oil sang it: “Daytime Telly, bluer than stone!” (Power and the Passion)

In the 70s there was still a censorship board but the decisions were mainly random and generally against violence. whipping scenes in convict movies were de rigeur and I assume deemed acceptable on the basis of history. Convict heritage was then becoming fashionably accepted after being previously a black mark of shame…

We had proscription against gun violence, Dirty Harry movies were a Restricted and highly censored when shown on TV.
 
Has anyone had a chance to watch that new Red Feline/Pachamama (or whatever the studio calls themselves nowdays) movie "Seditiosa" yet?

I see its something that's out now and purports to be a "female christ" type movie (like most of their stuff is I guess)

But several things put me on the fence about it pending some glowing reviews...wasn't sure if anyone else has seen yet?

Some things that are possibly off putting are if its Jac doing the whippings...the fact that they seem to be saying the ONLY whipping scene in movie is not just one girl but three at once (just ugh...why?)...and the trailer (which doesn't show ANYTHING of value)

Not sure if anyone saw and can say whether or not my concerns with this newest red feline thing are justified or not?
 
dryuya said:
Has anyone had a chance to watch that new Red Feline/Pachamama (or whatever the studio calls themselves nowdays) movie "Seditiosa" yet?

I see its something that's out now and purports to be a "female christ" type movie (like most of their stuff is I guess)

But several things put me on the fence about it pending some glowing reviews...wasn't sure if anyone else has seen yet?

Some things that are possibly off putting are if its Jac doing the whippings...the fact that they seem to be saying the ONLY whipping scene in movie is not just one girl but three at once (just ugh...why?)...and the trailer (which doesn't show ANYTHING of value)

Not sure if anyone saw and can say whether or not my concerns with this newest red feline thing are justified or not?
Click to expand...
It's only been out a couple of weeks, and is still being distributed, but there are a few first reactions in Margot's thread:

https://www.cruxforums.com/xf/threads/news-from-margot.4343/post-860490
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom