Very nice.. any reason you don’t insert your pics as thumbnails?INQUISITION
5 unpublished old pictures.
I see them as thumbnails...Very nice.. any reason you don’t insert your pics as thumbnails?
Some of your best in my opinion. Each one could have quite an interesting backstory!ROMAN ARENA
5 unpublished old pictures
Yes, but they are slightly different and smaller if they are attached as thumbnails, and there's no file info at the bottom. You are actually putting the full size image into the message, rather than a thumbnail-link to the attached image which I think uses less resources (someone correct me if I'm wrong).I see them as thumbnails...
Yes, you are correct. We encourage thumbnails as they save on costs, and viewers see the initial image clearly rather than as a blur.You are actually putting the full size image into the message, rather than a thumbnail-link to the attached image which I think uses less resources (someone correct me if I'm wrong).
I've always attached thumbnails. This happened some months ago. Something changed and I noticed there was no more file info at the bottom. Now this is the only way I can attach pictures. If I click "Attach files" and chose the files to attach, this is the result. Please, let me know how to solve this technical problem.Yes, but they are slightly different and smaller if they are attached as thumbnails, and there's no file info at the bottom. You are actually putting the full size image into the message, rather than a thumbnail-link to the attached image which I think uses less resources (someone correct me if I'm wrong).
I attached these images as thumbnails for comparison.View attachment 1054113View attachment 1054114