I changed you to 3A. We have abozt 3 of 10, who prefer to be vrucified about "friends". Here naturaly, the family question comes into my mind.
Actually, I wouldn't like to be seen by people who think about crucifixion as a religion-related thing either, but an erotic one
Yes, but this would lead us in a completely different direction. I was thinking about the quwestion, what would you in a passion play or an SM play allow on your body. Espesially the very softened religious passion plays, gave a very strange notion to this. The social background, such as family, enemies or friends watching you suffer is another, although also interesting, question.
I pay some religious respect to one specific crucifixion: It' obvious which one. I'd offer, on the other hand, my body for some SM play
Yes I’m not really gay, but I picked being raped for the extra humiliation- in my case : my kink exceeds my gender preferences by far.
Probably it is today not so much a problem for us heterosexuel males to get fucked than it was in acient times. Anyway, the male or female anus seems to be made for that....
Agreed! In the fantasy being crucified in front of onlookers and officials who want to see (and mock) a condemned criminal.
Rape in this fantasy is to my opinion not about gender preference, but about humiliation.
Agree: it Is not the same to have some (nice) private and vainilla gay sex than being exposed, humiliated and raped after some other tortures and prior to be crucified
Do you know the movie "spetters"? There is one situation, where a gay man is humiliated as gay man by having forced gay sex. That is an usual thinking of the 1970is, and in some sense in acient Rome... But is it today?
Very apart from epoch, I think some or even most gay men, including me, will feel humiliated from some point on if the Idea is not to give us pleasure, but to expose, degrade and injury us.
