geo901
Onlooker
Very sorry.At least the stories about the children could be resolved?As for example on the website - ravishu .The board rules prohibit the under-18 thing..
Very sorry.At least the stories about the children could be resolved?As for example on the website - ravishu .The board rules prohibit the under-18 thing..
No. Our service providers XenForo, who are generally very supportive and open-minded, insist that we keep off that topic entirely, to avoid any unwanted attention. If we don't keep to that condition, they'll shut us down.Very sorry.At least the stories about the children could be resolved?As for example on the website - ravishu .
For an audience it is interesting to see different ages on cross, and naturally it is interesting to see people you know before nude and crucified. There are story lines involving family members. I see here a little the trend to crucify young and good-looking females. I have no idea why this could be the case.I have a question thats bothering me Is it possible to crucify females/ males at differnet age span? Was it done previously
Yes, incredible, since crucifying old, grumpy and not good-looking males, for a minor offence, would save society a lot on pension and health costs purge it from stubborn and headstrong selfdeclared smart asses whom should be explained time after time that a smartphone has no rotary dial, and so that their wives can at last date that young and handsome toyboy, they dream of already for years!I see here a little the trend to crucify young and good-looking females. I have no idea why this could be the case.
For an audience it is interesting to see different ages on cross, and naturally it is interesting to see people you know before nude and crucified. There are story lines involving family members. I see here a little the trend to crucify young and good-looking females. I have no idea why this could be the case.
No photos or videos of the kids, just stories.Why not?Very sorry.At least the stories about the children could be resolved?As for example on the website - ravishu .
This can put the site in conflict with some laws... don't do it!!!No photos or videos of the kids, just stories.Why not?
To answer the question about non-violent rape. I love role play of all sorts. Being abducted by a burgler or home in vasion , or kidnaped and raped or abused. I act as though I am in pain or loseing my virginity and it brings out the agression in the rapeist . It makes the sex so intense . I probably wouldnt like being raped for real and it surely would be painful if I wasnt being turned on by it. Pretend violence, much like crux with rope pretending it is real nails ?Well there is no disputing that historical fact and modern morals often conflict.
As a writer I know I can get away with things in a printed book that is set in an historical time period (for example in the Victorian Era an arranged marriage of a 16 (or younger) year old girl to a 50 or something year old man that would have the morals police all over me if I made it a modern story.
The real problem becomes visual images. If you are creating cartoon like computer images you can probably get safely around most laws but don't use real actors.
And I believe in the UK it is now illegal to depict images of violent rape (although as a woman I am not sure what a non-violent rape would be) for pornographic purposes.
So Disney can do it make their point with violent rape in a released (and appropriately rated) film but god forbid Brazzers does it so you guys can get off.
But this is an old story. In America you can have a body count int he hundreds on prime time TV but you get yanked off the air if you show a pair of nipples.
The reality is money talks and politicians only care about getting reelected so that's why we have to be careful about crossing modern moral supremacists.
kisses
willowfall
No photos or videos of the kids, just stories.Why not?
Keep going Reb!At 76, I'm going strong.
Yes there are books outside and "showing" crucifixions of underage persons and yes, that is okay with the law. HERE in this forum it is for sure NOT legal! Reason: Here we discuss crucifixion most of the time as a sexual and arousing thing! And sex with underage persons is illegal and -in my opinion- ab-so-lu-tely strange, ugly and super perv. If only thinking at that makes me vomit.Since I am interested in "crucifixion literature", too (I mean, real, commerical books, you can buy at amazon or google, not fan-fic or user-generated content) I may add to this topic, that even if I completely accept the rules in this forum regarding this theme, during my "research" and interest in crux stuff over many years I noticed that there are books out there which have (fictional) crucifixion scenes with younger victims and they have not been rated "restricted" or "adults only" or whatever and were completely legal to buy and read in all countries where they are being sold.
I may add a few titles where I noticed this, for example the "Vespasian" Series by Robert Fabbri, where (beside many others...) a fourteen year old runaway slave is nailed to the cross, in "Gods and Lovers" with a similar event, in "The Ironsmith" by Nicholas Guild, where a sixteen years young bandit is being crucified ... and so on... Thats not supposed to be an "advertisement" for such books, only stating a matter of fact. Of course the "context" of all these books is ancient history and under the rule of the Roman Empire - where it belongs.
Of course regarding visual stuff and pictures thats a completely different matter, there I agree with "cruxlover".
Just my two cents....
Sure! An advantage of getting older is that, the more you do, the more young women there are!Personally, I would like to see more art and photos of mature crucified women.
I'm not quite sure what you mean, but your thoughts on the subject are above in this thread at:Just an FYI. My in-depth thesis on crucifying mature women can be found misplaced at the bottom of AGE SPAN page 3.