AI Photo Editing Deletion?

[BadTorture1988]

Firstly, you do not tell our members to "go fuck themselves". You wanted friendly advanced warning so I will give you one - if you continue to abuse other members and moderators you will be banned. I'm maybe an idiot but I will give you a chance to come to your senses.

I'm grateful to other members for their wise support. Yesterday evening four images of the same young woman appeared in a new thread and BadTorture1998 described what he'd like to do to her. Initially I thought it was fine, she was topless so I figured she was a model from somewhere, just like lots of other threads. But something about them wasn't right, and when I looked closer they looked like Facebook party images. Had she got her kit off in some bar somewhere? Too many shots, maybe?

One of the pictures had an address on it which led me to an app which proclaimed that it could make anybody nude.

What BadTorture1998 doesn't seem to get is that sometimes models earn cash by going to a photographer and having a set of racy pictures taken, either because they enjoy it or because they need the money. A release form is signed and they go out onto the internet and that's it. That is a world away from people who post images on social media whilst fully dressed and just having a good time. They should be able to do that without someone taking the image away to any software and changing it to make it appear pornographic. That is, patently obviously, a travesty of their right to privacy.

So the thread was deleted before the unfortunate lady involved might see it. Forget litigation - can you imagine how upsetting that would be for her and her family?

Also, there was no need to go full on Hercule Poirot, if you'd have asked I'd have been open about them. It's an online app called Undress AI. There's no big mystery or covert operation here.

Also with respect what others here don't seem to get is that you have no right to moralise when most of the content in this site is describing horrific things. You either fully reject it or you accept that you can't lecture people about morale values.

I've sent you a link that features a newsreader who I'm sure is real, wasn't modelling and hasn't signed waivers or anything that releases ownership and allows her picture to be shared on the net. How would *she* and *her* family feel of they saw a photoshopped image of her fingering herself?

I've been attacked since the first moment I arrived, and you wonder why I've been so aggressive? All I want to do is explore my darker fantasies in a safe space which I thought was this forum. I didn't realise I was going to get beat down by the Morality Police at every turn.

 

[BadTorture1988]

You'd better remove this one as well then, in case Roya happens to be browsing BDSM sites in between getting unfairly punished for not wearing the correct head gear....

Post in thread 'Whipping' https://www.cruxforums.com/xf/threads/whipping.4407/post-846787

 

[Puritan]

I’ve had concerns about this before.

Specifically images containing a young Emma Watson, yes the strident feminist warrior and campaigner against the abuse of women.

She would DEFINITELY not consent to having her face mapped onto naked tortured bodies, and might even launch some action or unwarranted attention if she were aware….

In that, the OP is definitely wrong to do this, but correct in pointing out the double standards.

 

[BadTorture1988]

I’ve had concerns about this before.

Specifically images containing a young Emma Watson, yes the strident feminist warrior and campaigner against the abuse of women.

She would DEFINITELY not consent to having her face mapped onto naked tortured bodies, and might even launch some action or unwarranted attention if she were aware….

In that, the OP is definitely wrong to do this, but correct in pointing out the double standards.

Thank you, that was the main point I was trying to get across. I'm happy for people to disagree with my actions, but I just ask for balance in the approach.

 

[BadTorture1988]

I’ve had concerns about this before.

Specifically images containing a young Emma Watson, yes the strident feminist warrior and campaigner against the abuse of women.

She would DEFINITELY not consent to having her face mapped onto naked tortured bodies, and might even launch some action or unwarranted attention if she were aware….

In that, the OP is definitely wrong to do this, but correct in pointing out the double standards.

And you're absolutely right, whilst glamour models may have inadvertently signed away their rights to not be photo-manipulated into a torture dungeon then what about Celebs? They're in the public eye yes but I don't believe they have agreed to such things.