Darkprincess69
High Priestess of Slaanesh
That's definitely the way I most fondly remember Carrie Fisher
A nice, fairly simple cosplay too;
-
Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.
Bare-Naked (Famous) Ladies
- Thread starter Primus pilus
- Start date
A nice, fairly simple cosplay too;
"Tongue action! More tongue action!" really does sound like directions in a porn flick.
Attachments
Loxuru
Graf von Kreuzigung
Going deeper on this theme and they could have made Return of the Jedi one of the spiciest SF movies ever! A missed opportunity!"Tongue action! More tongue action!" really does sound like directions in a porn flick.
An iconic scene from an otherwise boring movie (in fact largely retelling the story of the first Star Wars but lacking the magic).
Just recalling, Carrie Fisher had a stunt double for this scene :
Darkprincess69
High Priestess of Slaanesh
Now there's a bit of girl-on-girl action I would have liked to have seenGoing deeper on this theme and they could have made Return of the Jedi one of the spiciest SF movies ever! A missed opportunity!
An iconic scene from an otherwise boring movie (in fact largely retelling the story of the first Star Wars but lacking the magic).
Just recalling, Carrie Fisher had a stunt double for this scene :
View attachment 854407
Loxuru
Graf von Kreuzigung
Unfortunately, in the Original trilogy, Leia seems to be the only female in the whole far away Galaxy!Now there's a bit of girl-on-girl action I would have liked to have seen
And imagine the shocked reaction of C-3PO, when he discovers it.
Darkprincess69
High Priestess of Slaanesh
Unfortunately, in the Original trilogy, Leia seems to be the only female in the whole far away Galaxy!
What about Mon Mothma?
She was more or less the leader of the rebel alliance for a time, a long time ago, when Star Wars was still good
Attachments
Loxuru
Graf von Kreuzigung
It must be such a long time ago that Star Wars was still good, that I do not recall that character any more.
Darkprincess69
High Priestess of Slaanesh
Yeah for most of us that remember queuing up to see the original when it first opened, we would say that the saga ended with Return Of The Jedi. The later movies were not even close to capturing the spirit of the originals. The only good thing you can say about the absolutely dreadful Disney Star Wars trilogy is that it makes the prequels look acceptable
Star Wars is now a dead franchise, killed off by Disney's heavy-handed dumb marketing and the merciless infusion of political propaganda, not to mention the callous disrespect for the original characters. Nobody cares about Star Wars anymore. Ticket sales are down and the merchandise no longer sells. Disney and the now radical feminists that run Lucasfilm these days thought that they could use the iconic franchise to push a woke political message but the audience has told them in no uncertain terms that politics needs to stay the fuck out of our entertainment, otherwise the audience will eviscerate the studios at the box office.
Hollywood needs to start listening to the audience that actually buys the tickets rather than the radical far-left lunatic extremists on twitter who never go to the cinema in the first place, and if they refuse to do so, then we can all grab a packet of popcorn and watch Hollywood burn itself to the ground...
Gibbs505
SERVORUM DOMITOR
AMEN!!!Yeah for most of us that remember queuing up to see the original when it first opened, we would say that the saga ended with Return Of The Jedi. The later movies were not even close to capturing the spirit of the originals. The only good thing you can say about the absolutely dreadful Disney Star Wars trilogy is that it makes the prequels look acceptable
Star Wars is now a dead franchise, killed off by Disney's heavy-handed dumb marketing and the merciless infusion of political propaganda, not to mention the callous disrespect for the original characters. Nobody cares about Star Wars anymore. Ticket sales are down and the merchandise no longer sells. Disney and the now radical feminists that run Lucasfilm these days thought that they could use the iconic franchise to push a woke political message but the audience has told them in no uncertain terms that politics needs to stay the fuck out of our entertainment, otherwise the audience will eviscerate the studios at the box office.
Hollywood needs to start listening to the audience that actually buys the tickets rather than the radical far-left lunatic extremists on twitter who never go to the cinema in the first place, and if they refuse to do so, then we can all grab a packet of popcorn and watch Hollywood burn itself to the ground...
I think it died long before Disney. Lucas' decision to make Return of the Jedi all about a teddy-bear's picnic in the woods largely put the whole franchise on alert that it was supposed to be farcical, and this was only confirmed by the second trilogy (or was that the first trilogy) which was supposed to be the story of Anakin's descent into the dark side, and was derailed by the life story of Jar-Jar Binks, and various other silliness, with story falling to extensive CGI effects. I personally hailed the Disney/Abrams takeover, but I think by then it was too late. The original atmosphere and enthusiasm was gone, and the latest Star Wars stuff gets lost in a sea of superhero flicks. That's my jaded view only, of course.
If you love superhero flicks, go to it, and please know I do not mean personal insult.
Darkprincess69
High Priestess of Slaanesh
Personally I'm not a huge fan of the superhero genre, and today's obsession with over-the-top cgi action sequences does very little for me. I would prefer to see a return to smaller, story-driven movies wuth solid character building, and I think that things may well start to go this way in future as many audiences are being put off by headache-inducing special effects and mindless action squences that don't make any sense.I think it died long before Disney. Lucas' decision to make Return of the Jedi all about a teddy-bear's picnic in the woods largely put the whole franchise on alert that it was supposed to be farcical, and this was only confirmed by the second trilogy (or was that the first trilogy) which was supposed to be the story of Anakin's descent into the dark side, and was derailed by the life story of Jar-Jar Binks, and various other silliness, with story falling to extensive CGI effects. I personally hailed the Disney/Abrams takeover, but I think by then it was too late. The original atmosphere and enthusiasm was gone, and the latest Star Wars stuff gets lost in a sea of superhero flicks. That's my jaded view only, of course.
I agree about Return Of The Jedi, but that was still nowhere near as bad as the prequels, and those were nowhere near as bad as the Disney trilogy, although I did quite like Rogue One, and I think that this was the best Star Wars movie since the original trilogy. Solo wasn't very good and it lost a ton of money - the only Star Wars movie ever to lose money - although that was more to do with the audience backlash to The Last Jedi, which was totally abysmal from start to finish.
The problem with Jar Jar Abrams is that he's a total hack. He has no original ideas and only ruins existing franchises with a combination of substandard writing and resorting to his signature stupid mystery-box plotlines and harsh lens flare in every scene.
As for Return Of The Jedi, yes it was the weakest of the original trilogy and while most people would say that The Empire Strikes Back is technically the best of the original bunch, I still think that you have to go a long way to beat the very first one, if only for the wow factor and the sheer spectacle of putting something on screen that nobody had ever seen before. Sure the plot is paper-thin (and highly derivative of Japanese classics such as The Hidden Fortress), I'm old enough to remember the sheer excitement that gripped the whole world when it was released. No matter how hard Disney try, and however much money they throw at it, they will never achieve that level of thrill anymore, because audiences have gotten used to this sort of thing now and are far more jaded than they were 40-odd years ago.
And don't even get me started on the damn politics in movies... The problem with making a movie "relevant" is that you instantly make it dated. For example, tv shows like Star Trek Picard tries to be an allegory for Trump and Brexit - If you re-watch it ten years from now (why would you because it's complete crap?) it's going to look laughably out of date.
Great entertainment should be timeless, not relevant. Sure you can put a political message in there if you wish, but do it properly, like the original Star Trek did, by making the message part of the story. The trouble is that today's generation of so-called "writers" are so completely bereft of talent that they put the politics there instead of the story, and that results in a steaming pile of unwatchable crap
RacingRodent
Consul
Personally I'm not a huge fan of the superhero genre, and today's obsession with over-the-top cgi action sequences does very little for me. I would prefer to see a return to smaller, story-driven movies wuth solid character building, and I think that things may well start to go this way in future as many audiences are being put off by headache-inducing special effects and mindless action squences that don't make any sense.
I agree about Return Of The Jedi, but that was still nowhere near as bad as the prequels, and those were nowhere near as bad as the Disney trilogy, although I did quite like Rogue One, and I think that this was the best Star Wars movie since the original trilogy. Solo wasn't very good and it lost a ton of money - the only Star Wars movie ever to lose money - although that was more to do with the audience backlash to The Last Jedi, which was totally abysmal from start to finish.
The problem with Jar Jar Abrams is that he's a total hack. He has no original ideas and only ruins existing franchises with a combination of substandard writing and resorting to his signature stupid mystery-box plotlines and harsh lens flare in every scene.
As for Return Of The Jedi, yes it was the weakest of the original trilogy and while most people would say that The Empire Strikes Back is technically the best of the original bunch, I still think that you have to go a long way to beat the very first one, if only for the wow factor and the sheer spectacle of putting something on screen that nobody had ever seen before. Sure the plot is paper-thin (and highly derivative of Japanese classics such as The Hidden Fortress), I'm old enough to remember the sheer excitement that gripped the whole world when it was released. No matter how hard Disney try, and however much money they throw at it, they will never achieve that level of thrill anymore, because audiences have gotten used to this sort of thing now and are far more jaded than they were 40-odd years ago.
And don't even get me started on the damn politics in movies... The problem with making a movie "relevant" is that you instantly make it dated. For example, tv shows like Star Trek Picard tries to be an allegory for Trump and Brexit - If you re-watch it ten years from now (why would you because it's complete crap?) it's going to look laughably out of date.
Great entertainment should be timeless, not relevant. Sure you can put a political message in there if you wish, but do it properly, like the original Star Trek did, by making the message part of the story. The trouble is that today's generation of so-called "writers" are so completely bereft of talent that they put the politics there instead of the story, and that results in a steaming pile of unwatchable crap
See I have very mixed feelings about these statements. Some are spot on but some I majorly disagree with. For a start I liked Solo, watching that was the moment I really came to the conclusion I did not merely feel mild dislike towards The Last Jedi but was really disgusted with the way it trampled over everything, including characters like Rose Tico it had introduced and built up only to reduce to whiney ciphers at the end.
However over and above details and differences of opinion (for example I rate Rogue One as my second favourite Star Wars film after Empire) is I think an acute misunderstanding of politics. For example I like a lot of Clint Eastwood and I can spot his right wing politics driving them a mile off. A good story is often a good story whatever the politcs of its creator....many people enjoyed Return of the Jedi and slightly object to the Ewoks massacring more highly trained, better equipped and combat experienced stormtroopers but miss that was the central outcome of Lucas's politics.
That political outlook despite being based on some odd and historically controversial notions drove the creation of Star Wars which was a franchise with decades of momentum. A similar outlook was even more central to Avatar (though I have a lot of questions about the rightness of a bunch of spoiled brat teenage beings with a planet clearly created entirely for their hedonistic benefit by a technology superior precursor refusing to give up one tree to save an entire alien species). Still people lap up the idea that bows and arrows will beat modern armour and machine guns despite the historical reality of them losing to muzzle loading muskets, so give it a good story and the fans will flock.
I would also dispute the woke nature of Kathleen Kennedy and her ilk. They seemed to latch onto a feminist motif simply to cover for the absence of any creative direction and it was lack of creative direction not the politics that has ruined so much of Disney Star Wars. Lucas's prequel trilogy was I think almost objectively rubbish but it was consistent and held together and does have a generation of fans albeit smaller than for the originals, which he also tinkered with to their detriment. Showing perhaps more luck than judgement but also that a consistent vision is very important.
Disney have simply floundered. They have then tried to stir up some notion of a political cause when they had none. They just want to make money and have no idea how to remain true to anyone's grand vision for Star Wars.
Meanwhile superhero films range from the dire to ones with a very nuanced and thought through message but that is a whole other conversation.
elephas
Senator
Nudes by David Bailey
David Bailey, CBE (born 1938), a famous English photographer who was a popular figure in "Swinging London". He became one of prototypes for the character of Thomas, the photographer in "Blowup" by Michelangelo Antonioni (1966).
Models: Jean Shrimpton, Abbey Lee Kershaw, Catherine Deneuve, Lara Stone, Marie Helvin (Bailey), Jane Birkin, Vivien Neves.
David Bailey, CBE (born 1938), a famous English photographer who was a popular figure in "Swinging London". He became one of prototypes for the character of Thomas, the photographer in "Blowup" by Michelangelo Antonioni (1966).
Models: Jean Shrimpton, Abbey Lee Kershaw, Catherine Deneuve, Lara Stone, Marie Helvin (Bailey), Jane Birkin, Vivien Neves.
Just watched the 1931 version Threepenny Opera
en.wikipedia.org
saw Lotte Lenya playing Pirate Jenny
and naturally did a search for pictures of Frl. Lenya naked. This image result
almost certainly isn’t her, but the resemblance is at least plausible, and hey, a man’s gotta have a dream.
The Threepenny Opera (film) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
saw Lotte Lenya playing Pirate Jenny
and naturally did a search for pictures of Frl. Lenya naked. This image result
almost certainly isn’t her, but the resemblance is at least plausible, and hey, a man’s gotta have a dream.
Last edited by a moderator:
Ever since I watched Cyd Charisse all but exchange bodily fluids with Gene Kelly in "Singing in the Rain"
I've wanted to see her naked. The pictures below are the closest I’ve ever got.
*sigh*
I've wanted to see her naked. The pictures below are the closest I’ve ever got.
*sigh*
Attachments
Darkprincess69
High Priestess of Slaanesh
OK, well that took a lot of fiddling around but hopefully this is in line with your expectationsEnjoying.
Now can you make her look wet?
Turned out it wasn't too hard to do, but a bit fiddly and it only works with certain skin texture maps which is a bit weird but I think she looks pretty good all the same. In fact this skin map is better than the original, but loses a bit of the accurate likeness, but not too much I hope.
Enjoy
OK, well that took a lot of fiddling around but hopefully this is in line with your expectations
View attachment 857684
Turned out it wasn't too hard to do, but a bit fiddly and it only works with certain skin texture maps which is a bit weird but I think she looks pretty good all the same. In fact this skin map is better than the original, but loses a bit of the accurate likeness, but not too much I hope.
Enjoy
The likeness remains most acceptable.
