• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.

Crucified males

Go to CruxDreams.com
A mix for you

unusual painted crux, some ai art, a loincloth for those who like them, and a nice passion play scene

Rosa_Crucifixion_of_Polyclitus.jpg138429-4P6AklJhuI.jpg138429-1xMUbunZxb.jpg280501358_544914177028730_333460390004539516_n.jpg337139423_597095782054309_6399459233158897433_n.jpg
 
Thieves may be naked, but Jesus may not be, in classic Christian art.
 

Attachments

  • Giambologna Bad Thief.jpg
    Giambologna Bad Thief.jpg
    549.4 KB · Views: 171
  • Giambologna Good Thief.jpg
    Giambologna Good Thief.jpg
    663 KB · Views: 156
  • Thieves Naked Jesus Not.jpg
    Thieves Naked Jesus Not.jpg
    415.9 KB · Views: 170
  • Naked Thief 1.jpg
    Naked Thief 1.jpg
    318.2 KB · Views: 182
  • Naked Thief 2.jpg
    Naked Thief 2.jpg
    355.9 KB · Views: 192
I am a believer in the shroud but still have questions. Why would they whip his legs below knees and arms. Seems like a waste of effort. And if Christ who was whipped and crucified. A slave, a prisoner or a priest.
 
Not a bad crux scene but completely ridiculous, of course. The Anglo-Saxons (English) were Christians, it would have been the height of blasphemy to crucify a traitor/apostate like that, or anyone for that matter. Just would not have happened.

It's far more likely that the Vikings would have been the ones doing it, as a mockery to the new religion. I'm pretty sure that in the 1969 movie Alfred the Great Guthrum (played by Michael York) did have some English captives crucified in one scene. Very hard to find stills of that scene!

Anyway that's just my gripe about history on TV.

F28116431%2F201016244384%2F1%2Foriginal.jpg059 taylors nut crusher cross.jpg404346430_678578034365728_4531634610069093936_n.jpgistockphoto-484544394-170667a.jpgistockphoto-509929666-612x612.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom