Whatever the story there, the girl with the snake seems quite happy. The other two seem apprehensive. Better get them both a snake each as well, I expect.View attachment 1027024 on the right, Monty Python's Lying Down Circus?
Whatever the story there, the girl with the snake seems quite happy. The other two seem apprehensive. Better get them both a snake each as well, I expect.View attachment 1027024 on the right, Monty Python's Lying Down Circus?
Thanks for the link. I had missed this one.his video on “Crap Archery in “Helen of Troy” makes me laugh every time
I just can’t bear it every time someone draws a sword with that stupid metallic “schwingg” sound.. so dumb..Thanks for the link. I had missed this one.
In this movie obviously not only archery is crap.
But being specialised in Late Bronze Age eastern Med and Near East every movie about 'Troy' for me is crucifixion, impalement, rack-torture and burning on the stake in one ...
Never mind the film epics, I'm not sure that the Iliad is a very reliable guide to Late Bronze Age military science?Thanks for the link. I had missed this one.
In this movie obviously not only archery is crap.
But being specialised in Late Bronze Age eastern Med and Near East every movie about 'Troy' for me is crucifixion, impalement, rack-torture and burning on the stake in one ...
I really shouldn't take the bait, no, I really shouldn't ...Never mind the film epics, I'm not sure that the Iliad is a very reliable guide to Late Bronze Age military science?
Stripped topless and taken to a place of torture, the slave is to receive 200 welting lashes to it's bared breasts followed by nipple ring piercings.
Ah true!. But it is a timeless guide to the ultimate warrior culture (even if they are just overgrown BOYS, @willowfall ), and any who first read Hector's parting from his wife Andromache and his son Astyanax without a tear in the eye, has no heart.Never mind the film epics, I'm not sure that the Iliad is a very reliable guide to Late Bronze Age military science?
Yeah well.Ah true!. But it is a timeless guide to the ultimate warrior culture (even if they are just overgrown BOYS, @willowfall ), and any who first read Hector's parting from his wife Andromache and his son Astyanax without a tear in the eye, has no heart.
Ah true!. But it is a timeless guide to the ultimate warrior culture (even if they are just overgrown BOYS, @willowfall ), and any who first read Hector's parting from his wife Andromache and his son Astyanax without a tear in the eye, has no heart.
The story that 'Troy was a myth' itself is a myth mostly spread by Schliemann. In fact, during most of history it was pretty el known where the place was. Just nobody bothered (reminds me of fancy natural sciences like genetics, answering questions that nobody ever asked, because the answer is long known or irrelevant, but is a cute means to secure funding).For a long time Troy itself was considered a myth until Schliemann proved otherwise. There is no reason to assume they did not have a champion named Hector and there is no reason to assume that the champions didn't meet in mortal combat and Troy's champion lost.
The story that 'Troy was a myth' itself is a myth mostly spread by Schliemann. In fact, during most of history it was pretty el known where the place was. Just nobody bothered (reminds me of fancy natural sciences like genetics, answering questions that nobody ever asked, because the answer is long known or irrelevant, but is a cute means to secure funding).
It is also possible that there once was a wolf hiding in a granny's bed, when a girl with a red hood came to visit.
It is possible, but it is highly unlikely, just as it is highly unlikel that a Bronze Age 'prince' of Wilusa had a Greek name or that he would have fought as a 'champion', because all that we actually know about Bronze Age warfare is about considerable bodies of troops maneouvring, and not about 'duels' of single heros, that a backward culture, that could not muster larger numbers of soldiers, 450 years later thought appropriate.
"That it was Troy was not so don't leave out all the facts."The Tel which was excavated was widely known to exist and be ancient. That it was Troy was not so don't leave out all the facts.
Oh for heaven sake now you are nitpicking. It is widely known that story is a fairy tale and was never portrayed as anything else. That is a really bad example of a strawman argument. And of by the way "Mark Anthony" is not his real name. How often do you (or ANYONE) refer to him by his true Latin name?
And you are Soooooooo wrong about early Bronze Age warfare. Champion duels were nothing out of the ordinary and just as in the Middle Ages didn't preclude battles being settled by the armies. The existence of both simultaneously negates neither.
And "Princes" held on to being a prince by being in the middle of the action and archeology\history is FULL of stories of Royalty fighting along side the grunts. Because you weren't there there is no way for you to make a declarative statement that it didn't happen the way it is related through oral and written tradition.
It is of course very true that the deeds of ancient Royalty and heros was enhanced and manipulated (as it is today) by writers both at the time and in subsequent writings. And since very little documentation is extant that later writers used to relate their version of the story there is no way to fact check writer "A" v "B" or to check the "facts" either.
In essence you decided it didn't happen the way it is passed down because you want to believe it did happened but you have no conclusive facts to say otherwise, just your (and other's) opinions. And YES my opinion carries no more weight than your's does but I am NOT the one making declarative statements .
kisses
willowfall
That's very interesting - as well as exciting to watch, and yes the music's great, Charles Barber - quite new to me.Not exactly a Harem, but an artistic classic. The dance of the seven veils from the 1923 film version of Oscar Wilde's, Salomé. Great music. Ya gotta love Herod's lustful appreciation!
Oh, dear Eul,That's very interesting - as well as exciting to watch, and yes the music's great, Charles Barber - quite new to me.
Richard Strauss's opera had been performed at the Met once, in 1907, but there was enough puritanical pressure from wealthy patrons to prevent it sullying the pure minds of NY audiences again until 1934. So the film was a daring experiment - I've found this https://seenandheard-international....es-exoticism-of-silent-arthouse-movie-salome/
Charles Bryant’s 1923 silent film Salomé is one of the first ‘arthouse’ films to emerge from the USA. It was produced by and stars the flamboyant Russian actress Alla Nazimova whose stated aim was to raise the artistic level of American film. Based on Oscar Wilde’s play and inspired by Aubrey Beardsley’s illustrations, it is a highly stylised piece of cinema, but its extreme eroticism proved far too controversial for audiences of the time and it flopped.
But fortunately it wasn't lost, and Charles Barber was attracted by the idea of composing music for it (not much more than 10 years ago, I gather) - he used only Western and African percussion instruments and traditional rhythmic patterns of Arab music. Much more info on the site I've linked - and there's a couple of other, in some ways even more erotic - extracts in the follow-up videos (even a warning intervention by Angeluc Mortis can't assuage the lust of Salome for Jokanaan!)
Thanks for finding this, PrPr!