• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.

Introduction to the Torture of the Female Body

Go to CruxDreams.com
Funny how the kink brain works…

Agreed; we all have different boundaries. Some people are fine with the concepts of torture as long as it's kept imaginary and disconnected from any reality; others reduce the impact of real-world happenings by incorporating them into their fantasies. As Bart Simpson said, "C'mon, Lisa! If you don't watch the violence, how will you ever get desensitized to it?"
 
@torturman:
I wonder what makes the torture of women with electricity so exciting and attractive to torture fans?
I agree with everything @Online_Ratt has already said in this respect - the sweating, the movements like having sex... The one personal thing I would like to still add is: electro-torture is so tender. I think that torturers of women are eventually aiming at total domination of the woman, becoming the master of all her thoughts and feelings, even if that means erasing and plotting out all her thoughts and feelings expect the overwhelming pain inflicted on her. And electro-torture is so minimal in this sense: No brutal effects like hot irons or heavy pliers, no muscle strength of the torturer needed, as for the strappado or on the rack, not touching her at all. As already said, it's all done with a tiny movement of one's fingers on a knob, and the woman is in absolute agony, as much as the torturer deems fit. That's a most tender, polite way of inflicting the worst pain. And I still think the torture of a woman by a man is in it's essence a tender and intimate process, no matter how brutal and agonising it might become...

@Loinclothslave:
I do tend to assume our members posting such real-life scenarios aren’t actually psychopathic sadistic fascists, but it’s always a relief to hear that said. [...]
Yes, I guess everyone has his/her own limits between acceptable fantasy and repulsive reality... As long as this boundary is sound and solid, everything is fine! :)

@Online_Ratt :
But there's certainly room in my dungeon for tortures from the great eras of the past.
Yeah, oldies but goldies! :D

I'm a huge admirer of @Didymos 's work and would be happy to contribute to an update for his guide, or an appendix to it, if and when he's interested in doing it!
Oh, you flatterer!
I'm certainly open to new ideas! :)
 
I wonder what makes the torture of women with electricity so exciting and attractive to torture fans? The trembling and dancing of the body when the current passes? The terror of the woman? The inhuman sounds she makes? The possibility of changing the level of pain by changing the voltage?
This torture is popular among interrogators because of its effectiveness in obtaining information and is almost the most common torture method in the world.
For me, part of it is simply that it is low-effort/high-reward. And I would also agree, the easy adjustability, the ability to "Dial-A-Scream" makes it unique as far as I know.
Sometimes, within certain historical frameworks, particularly more recent history, I just can’t overcome my personal horror. It’s weird, I get off on being the victim and I’m perfectly happy to go medieval and ancient with incredibly awful torture, and execution, truly horrifying stuff yet it turns me on so much.

Yet more modern concepts can extinguish the kink element for me entirely. One clear example is the Holocaust- I just cannot be anything but appalled. I’m gravy most WW2 atrocities leave me similarly nonplussed.

Modern chattel slavery such as happens in Libya or for those poor Yazidi women under ISIS - completely zero kink interest for me, the brutal reality overwhelms me.

Yet create a fictious modern sub Saharan country that allows slavery and torture to me, and I can completely love it!
Yes! That is exactly how I feel about it. Seeing this brutality in the Real World is horrific.

But I think, as always, the key difference is consent. Even people whose kink is "non-consensual" consent at some point. Of course, there are places and cultures where the consent is forced by the mores, but that is a different discussion.
Thank you, and absolutely! I'm not saying the Latin American tortures were "better" than the medieval or ancient ones, only that they've become the the modern standard in countries where torture is practiced.

But there's certainly room in my dungeon for tortures from the great eras of the past. The torture horse, the strappado, the rack, the water tortures, the thumb- (and nipple-) screws, the Pear of Anguish, the Breast Ripper... there are lots of options out there.
Agreed. All of those things will always have a place in my personal dungeon, because there is something deeply intimidating about some of them. For example, take the Pear of Anguish, open it wide in front of your victim, and say "Imagine what this will feel like in your cunt, or in your asshole."

Many toys are such that I can get the victim's imagination to do half of the work of torturing them for me.
I think you've included all the important pieces, though I'd add a couple of small things. First, it's an astonishing feeling of power (pun intended) knowing that you can make a woman scream loud and long with a single movement of a single finger.

Second, I'd double-down on the "possibility of changing the pain by changing the amperage/voltage" piece: there are not many tortures that are so scalable so easily. Sure, you can add weights to the ankles of a woman on the torture horse, but it's an ungainly process compared to turning a rheostat.

Finally, I'd add that one of the effects of electrical torture is to cause the victim to sweat a lot (which is why Dirty War instituted regular breaks for sips of water), and seeing a woman glistening on the bedframe under the harsh lighting while she writhes and screams is very sexy. One of the rare torturers who gave an interview after the amnesty took effect specific ally mentioned that women undergoing electrical torture move like their having sex, and you can't say that about many other tortures.
I had never thought that that explicitly, but once you said it, I went, "Son of a gun, he's right!"

One other attraction of electrotorture in this modern era is this: With proper sensors and control, it can be used for "unattended torture." This allows leaving a victim in agony for hours at a time while the torturer is attending to others. Or, for a budget conscious torture establishment, one torturer can handle many more clients unassisted.

But there is one point against electrotorture that I will raise. If I am torturing a victim on a wooden pony as the primary agony, I can easily give them multiple things to think about by whipping their tits, as an example. So I can easily torture several different body parts/erogenous zones simultaneously but differently. Electrotorture on its own does not offer that flexibility. Which is why it will always be just one tool in my dungeon. A favorite tool, but still only one of many.
 
Dial-A-Scream
:clapclap: That's great! I'll remember that phrase.

take the Pear of Anguish, open it wide in front of your victim, and say "Imagine what this will feel like in your cunt, or in your asshole."
Many toys are such that I can get the victim's imagination to do half of the work of torturing them for me.
Agreed. Antici... ...pation is very important for letting the victim's anxiety grow. It's a fair point that some tools have more visual impact than others, but I will say that the process of slowing connecting the wires to her body while pointing out the effects the coming shocks will have on her can definitely play on the victim's imagination, particularly if she has experienced electroshock torture before.

With proper sensors and control, it can be used for "unattended torture."
I'm glad there's another person who has run across this. I know I've read an article discussing how this was accomplished, but I can't locate it now.

But there is one point against electrotorture that I will raise. If I am torturing a victim on a wooden pony as the primary agony, I can easily give them multiple things to think about by whipping their tits, as an example. So I can easily torture several different body parts/erogenous zones simultaneously but differently. Electrotorture on its own does not offer that flexibility. Which is why it will always be just one tool in my dungeon. A favorite tool, but still only one of many.
Fair point that it's not AS flexible as other tortures, and that on its own, it's a bit of a one-trick pony. But as the saying goes, "It's a good trick," and as you say, there are also great ways to combine it with other tortures. For example:
  • Instead of a whip, use a thin metal antenna (like the kind you find on old 1970s cars) to lash her instead. It leaves amazing stripes that hurt like hell, and if you put a wooden handle on it with an on/off switch and connect it to power, you can lash alone, shock alone, or lash with an accompanying shock.
  • Electricity is great at encouraging victims to maintain stress positions by, for example, putting copper plates under their heels or if she's hanging upside-down, by connecting chains to her nipples that will touch a copper plate on the floor unless she keeps her torso bent.
  • And of course, regardless of what device you're using, as long as it has (or can have) some metal touching the skin, it can be turned into an electrode whenever you want.
Options, right?
 
That's great! I'll remember that phrase.
Please do! ;-) I told you I had a way with words. :D
Agreed. Antici... ...pation is very important for letting the victim's anxiety grow. It's a fair point that some tools have more visual impact than others, but I will say that the process of slowing connecting the wires to her body while pointing out the effects the coming shocks will have on her can definitely play on the victim's imagination, particularly if she has experienced electroshock torture before.
And that is the slight hitch. Most folks don't have prior experience with electrotorture. Whereas, unless your victim is a total virgin, she has had things in her pussy, and can therefore more easily visualize what a torture pear would feel like. But yes, anything you can do to get inside her head helps accomplish your goal.
I'm glad there's another person who has run across this. I know I've read an article discussing how this was accomplished, but I can't locate it now.
Nor can I.
Fair point that it's not AS flexible as other tortures, and that on its own, it's a bit of a one-trick pony. But as the saying goes, "It's a good trick," and as you say, there are also great ways to combine it with other tortures. For example:
  • Instead of a whip, use a thin metal antenna (like the kind you find on old 1970s cars) to lash her instead. It leaves amazing stripes that hurt like hell, and if you put a wooden handle on it with an on/off switch and connect it to power, you can lash alone, shock alone, or lash with an accompanying shock.
  • Electricity is great at encouraging victims to maintain stress positions by, for example, putting copper plates under their heels or if she's hanging upside-down, by connecting chains to her nipples that will touch a copper plate on the floor unless she keeps her torso bent.
  • And of course, regardless of what device you're using, as long as it has (or can have) some metal touching the skin, it can be turned into an electrode whenever you want.
Options, right?
Fucking brilliant, mate! You are definitely my kind of evil bastard! :devil:

And you reminded me of what was (IIRC) the first electrotorture porn I ever saw. It was old Insex. I think it was with Molly, but after 20+ years, I am not certain. What I do recall was she was bound standing, with wooden boxes under her heels. So long as she stood on tiptoes, she was fine. But when she lowered her heels, it pushed a switch that turned on the electric shock. Yowza!
 
I’m glad you liked my summary. Feel free to use it if you ever post this elsewhere. :cool:

And I say without undue braggadocio that I have been acknowledged as having a way with words.

By the bye, have you thought about collaborating with @Didymos on an update or appendix to his guide? Yowza!

Yup. One of the masters of that genre is an author who wrote under the name Cortez.

Me too! Electrotorture has long been one of my favorites.
Cortez… Has he really stoped writing? His stories excite me so extremely much. I have searched the web over and over again the last ten years or so to find something new from his pen. If anybody knows something about him, please let us know!!
 
Cortez… Has he really stoped writing? His stories excite me so extremely much. I have searched the web over and over again the last ten years or so to find something new from his pen. If anybody knows something about him, please let us know!!
Me too! And no, I've not heard of anything new from him for years.

I also love Dante, The Marquis, skutttrusk, and Grendel among many others. ;-)
 
I am limiting the passage I quote, but the whole thing was brilliant. A thoughtful analysis and exposition of the lessons learned. Of how the torture and interrogation of women was changed from a cottage industry carried out by dilettantes into a mass market business carried out by trained professionals.

And yes, the non-kinky side of me is appalled, but the evil sadist in me is grinning like mad.

Agreed; we all have different boundaries. Some people are fine with the concepts of torture as long as it's kept imaginary and disconnected from any reality; others reduce the impact of real-world happenings by incorporating them into their fantasies. As Bart Simpson said, "C'mon, Lisa! If you don't watch the violence, how will you ever get desensitized to it?"
Thanks guys! Reading and chatting with you makes me feel so good!:) There are other "weird" people like me out there, and I feel less alone! :nusee:
 
Thanks guys! Reading and chatting with you makes me feel so good!:) There are other "weird" people like me out there, and I feel less alone! :nusee:
Same counts for me and many more on this forum.
 
Please do! ;-) I told you I had a way with words. :D
You do indeed!

And that is the slight hitch. Most folks don't have prior experience with electrotorture.
Fair point, though one or two introductory zaps before making the victim wait in fear for the next ones, watching as you turn up the current with the rheostat, would address that pretty quickly.

Fucking brilliant, mate! You are definitely my kind of evil bastard! :devil:
Thank you! In the same way you have a way with words, I have a certain... creativity. :D

And you reminded me of what was (IIRC) the first electrotorture porn I ever saw. It was old Insex. I think it was with Molly, but after 20+ years, I am not certain. What I do recall was she was bound standing, with wooden boxes under her heels. So long as she stood on tiptoes, she was fine. But when she lowered her heels, it pushed a switch that turned on the electric shock. Yowza!
I remember that one! Yes, an absolute classic. It took me a hot second to locate it, but I believe this is from it....
bdsmlr-380978-XdO2IGp2RD_s.gif
 
and seeing a woman glistening on the bedframe under the harsh lighting while she writhes and screams is very sexy. One of the rare torturers who gave an interview after the amnesty took effect specifically mentioned that women undergoing electrical torture move like their having sex, and you can't say that about many other tortures.

I also find this observation very keen-eyed and enlightening.
 
You do indeed!
Much obliged to you. :)
Fair point, though one or two introductory zaps before making the victim wait in fear for the next ones, watching as you turn up the current with the rheostat, would address that pretty quickly.
True.
Thank you! In the same way you have a way with words, I have a certain... creativity. :D
Indeed! And I, for one, thank you for sharing that creativity with us!
I remember that one! Yes, an absolute classic. It took me a hot second to locate it, but I believe this is from it....
View attachment 1563814
Bingo! I searched for it before posting, but apparently my google-fu was not as strong as yours.

Can you post the specifics, so I can hunt up a copy for myself, for nostalgia?
 
One thing that took me a long time to understand is why the survivors of torture in the Dirty War always recounted themselves as suffering one torture at a time. The military interrogators might hurt different parts of their body in sequence, but it seems they generally didn't layer or combine tortures. To me, it always intuitively felt like some tortures should "stack" -- have a cumulative effect so that the whole is worse than the individual elements. But research shows the human mind doesn't work that way.

If a person has multiple sources of pain to contend with, the mind will edit out the ones that are less important or less recent, so the person isn't overwhelmed. And if one of them is causing suffocation or asphyxiation, it will override all others.

So it seems that while changing the focus of the torture is a good idea, you should also limit yourself to just one painful treatment at a time.
 
One thing that took me a long time to understand is why the survivors of torture in the Dirty War always recounted themselves as suffering one torture at a time. The military interrogators might hurt different parts of their body in sequence, but it seems they generally didn't layer or combine tortures. To me, it always intuitively felt like some tortures should "stack" -- have a cumulative effect so that the whole is worse than the individual elements. But research shows the human mind doesn't work that way.

If a person has multiple sources of pain to contend with, the mind will edit out the ones that are less important or less recent, so the person isn't overwhelmed. And if one of them is causing suffocation or asphyxiation, it will override all others.

So it seems that while changing the focus of the torture is a good idea, you should also limit yourself to just one painful treatment at a time.
Very true.

You know that instant relief you get when you rub a bump or bruise? There's actually some cool science behind that natural instinct.

Back in 1965, two scientists figured out something called the Gate Control Theory of Pain, which basically explains why rubbing an owie actually helps. It turns out our nervous system has these natural "gates" that control pain signals, and when you rub an injury, you're actually sending fast touch signals that beat the pain signals to your brain and shut the gate before the pain gets through.

Pretty neat, right? It's like your body has its own built-in pain management system, and all those times your mom told you to "rub it better" - she was actually spot on with the science! This explains why so many natural pain relief methods work, even without medication. It's just one of those amazing ways our bodies have evolved to help us deal with pain.

And of course, knowing this, enables interrogators to exploit these systems.
 
One thing that took me a long time to understand is why the survivors of torture in the Dirty War always recounted themselves as suffering one torture at a time. The military interrogators might hurt different parts of their body in sequence, but it seems they generally didn't layer or combine tortures. To me, it always intuitively felt like some tortures should "stack" -- have a cumulative effect so that the whole is worse than the individual elements. But research shows the human mind doesn't work that way.

If a person has multiple sources of pain to contend with, the mind will edit out the ones that are less important or less recent, so the person isn't overwhelmed. And if one of them is causing suffocation or asphyxiation, it will override all others.

So it seems that while changing the focus of the torture is a good idea, you should also limit yourself to just one painful treatment at a time.
Very interesting. Somewhat counterintuitive, which inclines me to believe it. So it means I need to rethink my approach to longer torture sessions. Actually though, it makes my life easier, since doing two things at once is sometimes more challenging for me than sequential torture.
Very true.

You know that instant relief you get when you rub a bump or bruise? There's actually some cool science behind that natural instinct.

Back in 1965, two scientists figured out something called the Gate Control Theory of Pain, which basically explains why rubbing an owie actually helps. It turns out our nervous system has these natural "gates" that control pain signals, and when you rub an injury, you're actually sending fast touch signals that beat the pain signals to your brain and shut the gate before the pain gets through.

Pretty neat, right? It's like your body has its own built-in pain management system, and all those times your mom told you to "rub it better" - she was actually spot on with the science! This explains why so many natural pain relief methods work, even without medication. It's just one of those amazing ways our bodies have evolved to help us deal with pain.

And of course, knowing this, enables interrogators to exploit these systems.
Every slave I torture in the future will hate you for sharing this, so well done!
 
Ik vind deze observatie ook heel scherpzinnig en helderder.

One thing that took me a long time to understand is why the survivors of torture in the Dirty War always recounted themselves as suffering one torture at a time. The military interrogators might hurt different parts of their body in sequence, but it seems they generally didn't layer or combine tortures. To me, it always intuitively felt like some tortures should "stack" -- have a cumulative effect so that the whole is worse than the individual elements. But research shows the human mind doesn't work that way.

If a person has multiple sources of pain to contend with, the mind will edit out the ones that are less important or less recent, so the person isn't overwhelmed. And if one of them is causing suffocation or asphyxiation, it will override all others.

So it seems that while changing the focus of the torture is a good idea, you should also limit yourself to just one painful treatment at a time.
Very interesting. Somewhat counterintuitive, which inclines me to believe it. So it means I need to rethink my approach to longer torture sessions. Actually though, it makes my life easier, since doing two things at once is sometimes more challenging for me than sequential torture.

Every slave I torture in the future will hate you for sharing this, so well done!
One thing that took me a long time to understand is why the survivors of torture in the Dirty War always recounted themselves as suffering one torture at a time. The military interrogators might hurt different parts of their body in sequence, but it seems they generally didn't layer or combine tortures. To me, it always intuitively felt like some tortures should "stack" -- have a cumulative effect so that the whole is worse than the individual elements. But research shows the human mind doesn't work that way.

If a person has multiple sources of pain to contend with, the mind will edit out the ones that are less important or less recent, so the person isn't overwhelmed. And if one of them is causing suffocation or asphyxiation, it will override all others.

So it seems that while changing the focus of the torture is a good idea, you should also limit yourself to just one painful treatment at a time.
I partly agree with you, but I can't help but feel that when someone is hanging from a parrot swing, the electric shocks to the genitals are even more intense than they normally are. The same goes for being hit underfoot with a cane. I wonder if there are any experts on this forum who can provide clarification.
 
Back
Top Bottom