That would be consistent with the idea that Jesus looked entirely different from local people of the time, but that's only possible if you take a religious story at face value and give it the status of fact. Even if the conception of Jesus was "immaculate", the Holy Ghost likely doesn't have genes, in the physical sense, so where the X chromosome came from is anybody's guess. Religious stories don't go into that sort of detail, and Gospel writers didn't know about them, so they aren't necessary for the story. Putting 21st century knowledge onto a 1st century story gets one into all sorts of trouble, because in the 21st century we know scientifically that immaculate conceptions can't work, and likely never occurred. So the only Jesus we actually know is the one from the story, or from paintings, and he can look like anything we want him to look like.