I am talking about extensions which are no longer compatible each time Firefox is upgraded : it's not the case of the greater part of these you mention.
I think, for a specialist, you have too many extensions : startup must take several minutes ! I personnaly think that 3 or 4 are enough
For most people perhaps, but I have my own requirements, and though Firefox is always slow to start up, it's invariably up and running in under 20 seconds (which I will admit is not very fast these days, but it's no point having a fast browser if it doesn't do what I want)
VM and Virtualbox : how complicated ! Do you think seriously recommend it to current (non-geek) users ? It is less complicated executing Windows directly !
Well it CAN be complicated to get a VM up and running properly (especially if you want to use the more advanced features) but it's not really much more hassle these days than installing Windows from scratch (OK, I know most people never do this since they get Windows when they buy a computer) Don't forget that modern Linux distros have a software management system that works almost like an app store on a phone, making it ridiculously easy to install stuff, and the latest versions of Virtualbox are dead easy to get running.
I've only used Manjaro very briefly once and while it was quite nice, I don't like the way that it (being arch-based) does package management. Nothing wrong with the methods it uses of course, but I've used Debian-based Linux distros for so long that I can handle apt-get with my eyes closed
Of course being a rolling distro, you'll get the latest updates faster than I do, but then I choose to stay on an LTS distro simply because stability is more important (to me) than having all the latest and greatest software packages. Of course the nice thing about Linux is that it has something for everybody and we are all able to choose which method works best for us
Linux : lol It's not only (or not at all) a question of theme ! You must type line-to-line command each time there is a pb, XP theme or not...
One of the reasons I recommend Linux Mint to new users is because you will very rarely have to resort to the command line to get things done - Mint has a GUI for just about everything. Don't forget that many Windows problems require the use of the command line (aka DOS Prompt) to fix too. I've used Linux for a long time, over serveral different distros but even I have settled on Mint simply because it is just SO easy to use.
I wrote it in my first answer I lost : my "optimus" machine have not been compatible with Ubuntu family (as Mint) since Ubuntu 11.04. The ventilator blows terribly. It took several days and nobody succeeded in fixing it.
Other distributions don't have this inconvenient : I installed Manjaro, a 'rolling', much more interesting than Ubuntu family. But Linux in general is a non-ecological product.
Well I've not had any issues like that myself, but I know some people who have. Some hardware does experience a few issues, but I have to say that this is getting better with every kernel update
But if you like it, it's the essential
I agree with you (everyone agrees) for Windows 7 and Windows 10. As you know, the aim was introducing the "applications" model
Writing in English (or trying !) gives me headache lol
It's OK I can understand everything you are saying
I think that Microsoft are trying too hard to appeal to mobile users (Windows 10, like Windows 8 before it, is clearly designed for touchscreens) at the expense of its traditional desktop user base. Now Apple can kind of get away with this because most of their customers are young hipsters who are always looking for the latest trends. Microsoft's largest customer demographic though are conservative corporate users who require a traditional desktop experience within an office environment. The idea of ordinary domestic users running a Windows computer was something that they never managed to get their head around until Satya Nadella took over as CEO from that idiot Steve Ballmer. Now all of a sudden, they're trying to be Apple, and failing misrably. Most people would agree that the last version of Windows that was truly usable was Windows 7.
Windows 10 is better than Windows 8, but that's about all you can say about it
(don't even get me started of the built-in spyware though)
At the beginning my intervention concerned Flash Player in all systems
Npapi Flash is going to be updated in Linux (version 23) but anyway it works badly
Well as we both know, the world is moving away from Flash and towards HTML5 and although Adbobe have said they will continue to update Flash Player, this is really just the death throes of a software project that is struggling to remain relevant in the face of a changing technological landscape. Time will tell how this plays out of course, but as more and more end users switch to mobile devices (which generally do not support Flash) for their day-to-day computing activities, I don't see Flash Player being able to survive in the long term. Personally I can't do half of what I do on a mobile devive, but I fully realise that I am not in the majority - most people don't actually "do work" with their devices - they just surf the internet and use online services such as farcebook, twatter and indeed this very website, all of which can be done with relative ease (and a whole lot of eye strain) on mobile.
And you are right - I fear that we have drifted somewhat away from the original topic here and so perhaps this is the place where we should leave this fascinating discourse and allow the thread to return to the original subject matter