Sir, 'twas an age of fine, upstanding Gentlemen and lascivious, debauched reprobates ofcuntrycountry girls who deserved to have the full force of our just and lenient Laws expended on their worthless, depraved, debased Bodies. I trust, Sir, that you do not intend to perpetuate the most malicious Calumny now prevalent in our degraded times that slurs the honour of Justices and Magistrates who strove to do what was right, always within their strict and noble moral codes. If the slut received punishment, let none doubt that she must, most egregiously, have deserved every second of her fitting sentence(s).
I will thank you, SIR, not to insult us with loose talk of nonsensical 'happy endings' for wretched whores.
One wonders as to which my indignant friend is more likely to be descended from. (If not both - few gentlemen or magistrates would have wished for lustful girls of low birth to be truly purged from their vicinity - just replaced from time to time, like straw in a barn, once they grew too old or pox-marked.)
Quite the tragic unfolding. I wonder how the real girl's life compared, if she ever saw the pictures, and what she thought of them if she did.In 1732, the artist William Hogarth produced a set of 6 painting/etchings. They told a story, titled "A Harlot's Progress" (a take of on the very popular moral/religious book, John Bunyan's "Pilgrim's Progress"). After painting a prostitute in her boudoir in a garret on Drury Lane, Hogarth struck upon the idea of creating scenes from her earlier and later life.