now you've made cx a slave-boy, obeying his Mistress
(remember that in English, unlike the Romance languages,
the possessive adjective agrees with the subject not the object -
though as cx is possessed and Mistress possesses her,
that's baffling!
)
-
Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.
Waiting For The Master
- Thread starter Top-Cat
- Start date
(remember that in English, unlike the Romance languages,
the possessive adjective agrees with the subject not the object -
though as cx is possessed and Mistress possesses her,
that's baffling!
)
now you are making it much too difficult for google-translate usersnow you've made cx a slave-boy, obeying his Mistress
(remember that in English, unlike the Romance languages,
the possessive adjective agrees with the subject not the object -
though as cx is possessed and Mistress possesses her,
that's baffling!
and either microsoft nor babylon can do thattrue, Googletranslate doesn't even know cx's gender
(though 'his' doesn't agree with Mistress either)
cx is now just as confused....
Poor UCInow you've made cx a slave-boy, obeying his Mistress
(remember that in English, unlike the Romance languages,
the possessive adjective agrees with the subject not the object -
though as cx is possessed and Mistress possesses her,
that's baffling!
Eulalia the Admi already answered for me.
Google Translate, not verb conjugates, typically spends the entire phrase to the masculine (eg è very common for writers forum writing: ". I was there on the cross thinking about my lover, when he arrived"
Well for those who do not know the Forum, will think that the woman is thinking about the crucified lover (male), when in fact it is a (female) lover.
This person will only know this when she read another sentence like this: She touched my wet pussy, and I remembered when I touched her wet pussy. "
Depend on Google translator is not easy.
you can call this slavegirl "it"
Good photography in 9 & 10
#4... what more to be said....
Tree
Tree