• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.

Bare-Naked (Famous) Ladies

Go to CruxDreams.com
I would still prefer a naked Emma Watson.

Emma is undoubtable cute but I think I'd prefer Catherine Zeta-Jones in her hay day. And there are a host of Babylon 5, Star Trek, Star Wars girls and Christian Cloke (Space Above and Beyond) who'd I'd put in front of Emma.

To say nothing of Lucy Lawless.

Come to think of it. I'm not sure Emma would make my top 50. Provided of course I could have them in their prime.

Of course I don't make a lot so whom I could own would depend a lot on the slave market prices at the time. Decisions, decisions!

kisses

willowfall
 
Of course I don't make a lot so whom I could own would depend a lot on the slave market prices at the time. Decisions, decisions!
Well, if you're going to insert stark reality into this, then I think most of us would have to admit that we can't afford those "Mercedes" and "Lambourgini" models, but are likely stuck a used Toyota Corolla type slavegirl, if we're lucky, and might have to settle for hiring a cleaning slave to come in once every two weeks. If that was where we were all heading, this forum will collapse under the weight of it's own accuracy. We must dream bigger than that - a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through. :D
 
We must dream bigger than that - a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through. :D


While I agree in connection with the forum I can think a number of Generals and quite a few politicians who applied the same maxim to their decisions\action which lead them to disaster ........... both themselves and their followers.

Come to think of it, before the (general not total) abolition of slavery I think following such knuckle heads is how an awful lot of the slaves found themselves on the block. Or in the case of the females, on their backs (or whatever position your corrupt sadistic little heart wants them in).

kisses

willowfall
 
Yulia Peresild is shooting a movie on the ISS.


And looks great naked. ;) :babeando:
 

Attachments

  • 9860EED2-E23F-4FCD-9DD8-9686ECEC7A47.jpeg
    9860EED2-E23F-4FCD-9DD8-9686ECEC7A47.jpeg
    100.1 KB · Views: 105
  • DA68F31F-DE14-4DC4-8ACE-50998461239E.jpeg
    DA68F31F-DE14-4DC4-8ACE-50998461239E.jpeg
    147 KB · Views: 101
  • A791139C-0C42-4D06-BB39-7F9554F5154E.jpeg
    A791139C-0C42-4D06-BB39-7F9554F5154E.jpeg
    165.8 KB · Views: 124
  • 4085E91C-C7D0-41E4-A40B-2ED1FF7A6F89.jpeg
    4085E91C-C7D0-41E4-A40B-2ED1FF7A6F89.jpeg
    131.4 KB · Views: 106
  • CFB176A8-1052-4BFE-873F-0BB4193B4101.jpeg
    CFB176A8-1052-4BFE-873F-0BB4193B4101.jpeg
    155.1 KB · Views: 101
  • 41A13858-6AB2-4B62-A240-50FDC76455BA.jpeg
    41A13858-6AB2-4B62-A240-50FDC76455BA.jpeg
    101.7 KB · Views: 112
Yulia Peresild is shooting a movie on the ISS.


And looks great naked. ;) :babeando:
Now all we need is for her to combine the two and have some genuine zero-g porn :p

NOT like the 40-second-long zero-g segment in The Uranus Experiment Part 2 which featured Sylvia Saint (whatever happened to her?) and (allegedly) filmed at huge expense onboard NASA's vomit comet. I say "allegedly" because the only bit that gives any impression of zero-g is when the cumshot spurts sideways, but you could easily do that by placing the camera on its side :)

For those who are interested, the disappointing (one might even say "anti-climactic) clip can be found here;

Got to say that Sylvia isn't looking her best in this one, and of course I would have been happier to see her doing it with another woman but yeah whatever... :)

Here's a much better pic of Sylvia - gotta LOVE those matching nails and cute quim - I used to diddle myself stupid over her a couple of decades ago :p
3.jpeg
 
NOT like the 40-second-long zero-g segment in The Uranus Experiment Part 2 which featured Sylvia Saint (whatever happened to her?) and (allegedly) filmed at huge expense onboard NASA's vomit comet.
Princess, Ms. Saint is still in the business as a director, and you’ll be happy to know she works exclusively with women.

 
NOT like the 40-second-long zero-g segment in The Uranus Experiment Part 2 which featured Sylvia Saint (whatever happened to her?) and (allegedly) filmed at huge expense onboard NASA's vomit comet. I say "allegedly" because the only bit that gives any impression of zero-g is when the cumshot spurts sideways, but you could easily do that by placing the camera on its side
There is nothing that convincingly suggests zero-g sex in that clip. Everything is done in close-up, and you wonder how they stay in one place. Is one of them holding onto something (the guy seems to just be holding onto her). In zero-g, one might imagine that they'd be floating around and difficult to keep in the frame of the camera.
 
There is nothing that convincingly suggests zero-g sex in that clip. Everything is done in close-up, and you wonder how they stay in one place. Is one of them holding onto something (the guy seems to just be holding onto her). In zero-g, one might imagine that they'd be floating around and difficult to keep in the frame of the camera.
there was zero-g porno's by the private studios, The Uranus Experiment 2 with Silvia Saint, think it was shot in a parabolic flight. Didn't watch that movie, although Silvia Saint is worth to look at.
 
which reminded me I wanted to look at Anne Hathaway naked again.
I'm not entirely sure that one needs to watch a PG film to feel that way, but if it works for you, go to it. :thumbsup:

Mind you, it's better than this chap - he's just stumbled into the dimension of six Anne Hathaways at once in his living room, and he's got no idea what to do now (but in classic sci-fi B-movie style, his lower legs have come unstuck from the rest of him). :rolleyes: :devil:
437.jpg

(image externally hosted) :devil:
 
Back
Top Bottom