Yes.Wouldn't we all?
Yes.Wouldn't we all?
I would still prefer a naked Emma Watson.
Well, if you're going to insert stark reality into this, then I think most of us would have to admit that we can't afford those "Mercedes" and "Lambourgini" models, but are likely stuck a used Toyota Corolla type slavegirl, if we're lucky, and might have to settle for hiring a cleaning slave to come in once every two weeks. If that was where we were all heading, this forum will collapse under the weight of it's own accuracy. We must dream bigger than that - a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through.Of course I don't make a lot so whom I could own would depend a lot on the slave market prices at the time. Decisions, decisions!
We must dream bigger than that - a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through.
Now all we need is for her to combine the two and have some genuine zero-g pornYulia Peresild is shooting a movie on the ISS.
And looks great naked.
Damn! Those nipples could carry a whole film!Yulia Peresild is shooting a movie on the ISS.
And looks great naked.
One of the first results for "women’s breasts in microgravity" is Kate Upton's 2014 ride on the Vomit Comet, but she wore a bikini top. Dammit.Damn! Those nipples could carry a whole film!
Her breasts were not the only things defying gravity on that video.One of the first results for "women’s breasts in microgravity" is Kate Upton's 2014 ride on the Vomit Comet, but she wore a bikini top. Dammit.
Princess, Ms. Saint is still in the business as a director, and you’ll be happy to know she works exclusively with women.NOT like the 40-second-long zero-g segment in The Uranus Experiment Part 2 which featured Sylvia Saint (whatever happened to her?) and (allegedly) filmed at huge expense onboard NASA's vomit comet.
There is nothing that convincingly suggests zero-g sex in that clip. Everything is done in close-up, and you wonder how they stay in one place. Is one of them holding onto something (the guy seems to just be holding onto her). In zero-g, one might imagine that they'd be floating around and difficult to keep in the frame of the camera.NOT like the 40-second-long zero-g segment in The Uranus Experiment Part 2 which featured Sylvia Saint (whatever happened to her?) and (allegedly) filmed at huge expense onboard NASA's vomit comet. I say "allegedly" because the only bit that gives any impression of zero-g is when the cumshot spurts sideways, but you could easily do that by placing the camera on its side
there was zero-g porno's by the private studios, The Uranus Experiment 2 with Silvia Saint, think it was shot in a parabolic flight. Didn't watch that movie, although Silvia Saint is worth to look at.There is nothing that convincingly suggests zero-g sex in that clip. Everything is done in close-up, and you wonder how they stay in one place. Is one of them holding onto something (the guy seems to just be holding onto her). In zero-g, one might imagine that they'd be floating around and difficult to keep in the frame of the camera.
I'm not entirely sure that one needs to watch a PG film to feel that way, but if it works for you, go to it.which reminded me I wanted to look at Anne Hathaway naked again.