Bondage / Captivity / Interrogation / Torture Scenes in Mainstream Movies

[Praefectus Praetorio]

The Name of the Rose (TV Series)
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7572868/

A young adulteress is captured by the troops of Bernardo Guy, the Great Inquisitor.

Video: https://nudogram.com/videos/1888/camilla-diana-nude-the-name-of-the-rose-2019-s01e02-hd-1080p/

"The Demon is always a Master Deceiver. His weapon of choice, a woman!" How True!

 

[dommmu]

Please note: Since the following movie is based on real and vile events, I want to make it clear that I do not find the selected scenes alluring or arousing in any way. I am just posting them because they fit the topic of the thread. And just to be sure: I realize that the actress looks really young, but she was in fact over 30 when the movie was made.

Antonia Campbell-Hughes in "3096" (2013) - https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1667355/

Natascha is kidnapped by Wolfgang and lives for 8 years in his house as his personal household slave (and occasional sex slave). For the longest time, she is forced to live in a makeshift basement dungeon. She is only let out for personal hygiene.


Later, she is allowed to move upstairs into an empty room of the house. Of course, she must help to refurbish it first. Her captor does not want her to ruin her clothes from all the dirt and so she must do the work naked.


Wolfgang spends the first night in her new room with Natascha. He uses a zip tie to secure her to the bed.


One day, the drainage of the house needs to be cleaned. It is of course Natascha who has to do the dirty work.


As said before, the movie is based on a true case. They even used the real names of the actual persons involved. It happened in Austria. The girl was kidnapped in 1998 and managed to escape in 2006 when she and her captor were washing his car outside and he was distracted by a phone call. Living in Germany, I remember it being all over the news for several days.

As repulsive as the case is, it seemed to be solved quite easily. The official version is: Wolfgang did everything on his own. After he noticed his mistake and the escape of his victim, he went to his best friend, confessed everything to him and asked him to keep it as a secret for another day. He commited suicide the same evening by throwing himself in front of a train.

But looking closely to the case, it becomes somehow mysterious. There are certain things that just do not add up, like for example:
- A witness of the kidnapping stating that it was done by two men instead of one.
- A large sum of money that the kidnapper transferred to his friend shortly before his suicide.
- A suicide note that was probably not written by the kidnapper (different handwriting).
- His lethal injuries not fitting to being hit by a train.

 

[Jon Smithie]

Please note: Since the following movie is based on real and vile events, I want to make it clear that I do not find the selected scenes alluring or arousing in any way. I am just posting them because they fit the topic of the thread. And just to be sure: I realize that the actress looks really young, but she was in fact over 30 when the movie was made.

Antonia Campbell-Hughes in "3096" (2013) - https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1667355/

Natascha is kidnapped by Wolfgang and lives for 8 years in his house as his personal household slave (and occasional sex slave). For the longest time, she is forced to live in a makeshift basement dungeon. She is only let out for personal hygiene.
View attachment 705873 View attachment 705874

Later, she is allowed to move upstairs into an empty room of the house. Of course, she must help to refurbish it first. Her captor does not want her to ruin her clothes from all the dirt and so she must do the work naked.
View attachment 705875 View attachment 705876

Wolfgang spends the first night in her new room with Natascha. He uses a zip tie to secure her to the bed.
View attachment 705877 View attachment 705878

One day, the drainage of the house needs to be cleaned. It is of course Natascha who has to do the dirty work.
View attachment 705879 View attachment 705880 View attachment 705881

As said before, the movie is based on a true case. They even used the real names of the actual persons involved. It happened in Austria. The girl was kidnapped in 1998 and managed to escape in 2006 when she and her captor were washing his car outside and he was distracted by a phone call. Living in Germany, I remember it being all over the news for several days.

As repulsive as the case is, it seemed to be solved quite easily. The official version is: Wolfgang did everything on his own. After he noticed his mistake and the escape of his victim, he went to his best friend, confessed everything to him and asked him to keep it as a secret for another day. He commited suicide the same evening by throwing himself in front of a train.

But looking closely to the case, it becomes somehow mysterious. There are certain things that just do not add up, like for example:
- A witness of the kidnapping stating that it was done by two men instead of one.
- A large sum of money that the kidnapper transferred to his friend shortly before his suicide.
- A suicide note that was probably not written by the kidnapper (different handwriting).
- His lethal injuries not fitting to being hit by a train.

I had similar qualms about posting pics from "The Girl Next Door," which was based on a true case that happened in the U.S. Basically for me, though, anything from a movie is fair game. A movie, even one which is ostensibly presenting an incident or issue honestly and accurately, is still being filtered through a certain amount of interpretation, speculation, and even fantasy. Depending on how far I perceive that interpretation to wander from strict accuracy and honesty, I feel more or less guilt about using scenes, images, or even ideas from a film to fuel my own perverted fantasies. So a scene of brutality and torture from "SS Camp 5," I can get excited about. A scene of brutality and torture from, say, "Schindler's List," doesn't turn me on at all, quite the reverse. But everyone will draw their own lines and have their own grey areas.

A question about the actual case of Natascha's kidnapping-- What did she have to say about how many men kidnapped her? It seems likely to me that she would have been aware of the involvement of another party in the kidnapping. Surely if another man had helped Wolfgang take her, he would have expected to share her services.

 

[hammers]

In this space a special place is deserved by the Spanish director Jesus Franco Manera better known as JESS FRANCO (1930-2013). Starting from the sixties his voluminous work is comprehensive of 160/180 (exact number is not defined) movies. As lovers of his films well know, his distinctive mark was explicit nudity and erotism not disdaining sadomasochism. He intrigued his audience by showing enough to make them want more. Giving an exhaustive picture of Franco's character is no easy task: he was a director, a screenwriter, an actor, a composer of music , and a producer of a dozen of his own films.
In the seventies he met actress Lina Romay : she became his muse and the star of his films as well as, later on, his life's companion for 40 years. Franco married her officially in 2008. She died in 2012, Jess Franco followed her in 2013. He was,in due course ,regarded by the Majors as a director of porn genre. His films,mostly not released outside Europe, were produced on low budgets. Except in a few circumstances,they were habitually funded insufficiently. Jess Franco had made a point to himself to emulate the big American productions directed by famous
Hollywood's Names. As a matter of fact his work spaced through popular entertaining subjects from adventure to giallo and horror and from
nunsploitation and nazisploitation to vampirism, women in prison and so on. Critics quote the following titles among his best :
Title: Year:
"THE AWFUL DR ORLOFF" 1961
"VAMPYROS LESBOS" 1971
"VENUS IN FURS" (aka PAROXYSMUS) 1969
" WANDA THE WICKED WARDEN" 1977
" SUCCUBUS" 1968
"LOVE LETTERS OF A PORTUGUESE NUN" 1977
" THE DEMONS " 1973
" COUNT DRACULA" 1970
" 99 WOMEN " 1968
" EXORCISM" 1970
" THE BLOODY JUDGE" (already mentioned in the Forum) 1969
" MARQUIS DE SADE JUSTINE" 1969
" BLOODY MOON" 1981

 

[hammers]

More posters from Jess Franco's movies :

 

[hammers]

I enclose a clip from Jess Franco's "Love letters from a Portuguese Nun"

 

[hammers]

I enclose clip from ''99 Women'' and ''Wanda the wicked warden"

 

[hammers]

I enclose some more stills from ''Wanda the wicked warden"

 

[dommmu]

A question about the actual case of Natascha's kidnapping-- What did she have to say about how many men kidnapped her? It seems likely to me that she would have been aware of the involvement of another party in the kidnapping. Surely if another man had helped Wolfgang take her, he would have expected to share her services.

Sorry to go a bit off topic, but I have the feeling that I wrote something in my last post that could be misunderstood. So I want to make this clear: There are many people on the internet who claim that she made up the events in order to gain publicity. Yes, a few years later she wrote a book about her time in captivity (that admittingly sold very well). But I think everyone who says that she only wants to profit from the story is talking bullshit!

The only thing that is clear (and proven) is that the police made several major mistakes while investigating the missing person case. If those where done deliberately or due to incompetence is a matter of speculation.

She gave a TV interview just two weeks after her escape. I remember watching the interview and having the feeling that she was pulled in front of the camera by sensationalist reporters rather than jumping in front of it in the search of publicity. However, she made some interesting statements in this interview:
- She denied sexual assault in any form (that is different in the movie).
- She was outraged by the fact that images of the inside of the house, especially from the basement dungeon, had been published.
- She described herself as the dominant person in the relationship with her captor, since he supposedly had a fragile personality.

Regarding the question of wether the kidnapping was done by one or two men, she only confirmed her captor being involved. There is a leaked police video on Youtube (in German) of the mentioned witness reconstructing the kidnapping on location. The witness however was unable to identify the supposed second kidnapper. I am not posting the link to the video since I don't want this thread to turn into a discussion of any conspiracy theories.

 

[MICHELE PATRI]

Satanico Pandemonium (1975)

https://www.cutscenes.net/videos/3078/satanico-pandemonium-1975/


Satánico Pandemonium (aka La sexorcista) is a Mexican cult nunsploitation horror film directed by Gilberto Martínez Solares and written by Jorge Barragán, Adolfo Martínez Solares and Gilberto Martínez Solares. It stars Cecilia Pezet, Enrique Rocha and Delia Magaña.
Sister Maria lives with the convent for her charity works, but in the secret downs of her fantasies, she becomes agonized by visions from another world, a world in which she is permitted to run free. In this world Satan is her lord, and her acts of violence and blasphemy mount. Sister Maria realizes that she is elected by the Devil himself to destroy the convent and lead her sister nuns into hell. Only the Devil can intuit the dark secrets of her tortured mind.

 

[MICHELE PATRI]

First torture scene:

 

[MICHELE PATRI]

Second torture scene:

 

[MICHELE PATRI]

Third torture scene:

 

[Jon Smithie]

Sorry to go a bit off topic, but I have the feeling that I wrote something in my last post that could be misunderstood. So I want to make this clear: There are many people on the internet who claim that she made up the events in order to gain publicity. Yes, a few years later she wrote a book about her time in captivity (that admittingly sold very well). But I think everyone who says that she only wants to profit from the story is talking bullshit!

The only thing that is clear (and proven) is that the police made several major mistakes while investigating the missing person case. If those where done deliberately or due to incompetence is a matter of speculation.

She gave a TV interview just two weeks after her escape. I remember watching the interview and having the feeling that she was pulled in front of the camera by sensationalist reporters rather than jumping in front of it in the search of publicity. However, she made some interesting statements in this interview:
- She denied sexual assault in any form (that is different in the movie).
- She was outraged by the fact that images of the inside of the house, especially from the basement dungeon, had been published.
- She described herself as the dominant person in the relationship with her captor, since he supposedly had a fragile personality.

Regarding the question of wether the kidnapping was done by one or two men, she only confirmed her captor being involved. There is a leaked police video on Youtube (in German) of the mentioned witness reconstructing the kidnapping on location. The witness however was unable to identify the supposed second kidnapper. I am not posting the link to the video since I don't want this thread to turn into a discussion of any conspiracy theories.

Very interesting, unusual case.

I am not posting the link to the video since I don't want this thread to turn into a discussion of any conspiracy theories.

Thank you for that.

 

[dommmu]

After the very sinister and rather depressing "3096" from my last post, it is now time for something lighter and more upbeat...

Shu Qi in "The Transporter" (2002) - https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0293662/

Frank (Jason Statham) does illegal transports for a living. He notices something strange about his latest delivery: It is moving! Against his own rules, he opens the package and finds a tied up and gagged Lai (Qi) in it.


Lai tricks Frank into helping her out of the trunk for a bathroom break. She tries to run away, but Frank catches her.


Annoyed by his own stupidity, he delivers her to the destination without any further delays. Nothing good awaits her there.

 

[dommmu]

The recipient of the package is not very nice to Frank. He secretly plants a bomb in his car to get rid of him as a witness. Frank avoids the explosion by chance. Understandably angry about his day having turned from bad to worse, he returns to his customer, shoots up the house and steals one of his cars as compensation for his own that he lost to the explosion. Three guesses who he finds in the back seat...


Having had enough trouble for one day, Frank thinks about abandoning Lai at the road...


...but decides against and takes her home instead. And that's where his real troubles begin.


"The Transporter" is a modern action classic and in my opinion one of Luc Besson's prime works. Fast paced action sequences connected by witty dialogs. Especially the interactions between Frank and Lai are really funny. A nice popcorn movie for everyone who wants to sit back and be entertained for 90 minutes without thinking too much.

 

[hammers]

On the historical medieval novel "The Devils of Loudun" the controversial British director Ken Russell based his movie " THE DEVILS" in 1971.The memory of violence,torture,sex,various distasteful acts still lingers in spectators even at distance of years from first vision. According to many chronicles this movie was never released in integral version.At the time of release claims came up against alleged profanation of Catholic religion even after Censors in many Countries had cut-off,among others, one scene showing the Nuns sexually assaulting a crucifix. At the centre
of the plot is a 17th Century Catholic priest in France indicted and eventually executed as possessed by the Devil. His accuser is a deformed
repressed Abbess sexually obsessed with him. The film runs also on unreal dreamy sequences set in gloomy atmospheres of intrigues ,chaos
and miseries of a City in that historical period.

 

[Jon Smithie]

View attachment 707239View attachment 707240View attachment 707241View attachment 707243View attachment 707245View attachment 707248View attachment 707249View attachment 707250View attachment 707251On the historical medieval novel "The Devils of Loudun" the controversial British director Ken Russell based his movie " THE DEVILS" in 1971.The memory of violence,torture,sex,various distasteful acts still lingers in spectators even at distance of years from first vision. According to many chronicles this movie was never released in integral version.At the time of release claims came up against alleged profanation of Catholic religion even after Censors in many Countries had cut-off,among others, one scene showing the Nuns sexually assaulting a crucifix. At the centre
of the plot is a 17th Century Catholic priest in France indicted and eventually executed as possessed by the Devil. His accuser is a deformed
repressed Abbess sexually obsessed with him. The film runs also on unreal dreamy sequences set in gloomy atmospheres of intrigues ,chaos
and miseries of a City in that historical period.

Based on the true story of Urbain Grandier, a Catholic priest accused and eventually executed for sorcery. He was charged with summoning demonic spirits that possessed the nuns in an Ursuline convent in Loudun, France. He was tortured, and though he did not admit guilt, was convicted and burned alive at the stake.

 

[thehangingtree]

Based on the true story of Urbain Grandier, a Catholic priest accused and eventually executed for sorcery. He was charged with summoning demonic spirits that possessed the nuns in an Ursuline convent in Loudun, France. He was tortured, and though he did not admit guilt, was convicted and burned alive at the stake.

...a true story?!?!?!

 

[messaline]

Based on the true story of Urbain Grandier, a Catholic priest accused and eventually executed for sorcery. He was charged with summoning demonic spirits that possessed the nuns in an Ursuline convent in Loudun, France. He was tortured, and though he did not admit guilt, was convicted and burned alive at the stake.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loudun_possessions