• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.

Crucified males

Go to CruxDreams.com
Leonthebull said:
I've been playing around with some image ideas on carrying the cross. Is it better to see these men carry a full cross or just a cross bar? Also, is it better to see them marching naked or with a skimpy loincloth? I like the idea of a small loincloth; since when they reach the hill, it's more fun to rip off their coverings; stripping them naked right after they are nailed up.
Click to expand...
Is this your work? Nice job

I definitely prefer the first image, and if my loincloth must be removed, then at the last image, after my wrists are nailed seems appropriate
 
BondageBoy said:
Thinking out loud…should we put up a survey and get some feedback on “preferred styles”? Realize that the majority probably prefers nude but personally I find loincloths to be quite sexy and attractive on the body of a crucified male providing they’re not those large, flowing bedsheet types found in some paintings and illustrations. I’m more of a Fundoshi style or other “barely there” style of loincloth…low on the hips, just enough to cover the genitals…maybe a small pouch gathered in front? Might be fun to see what others have to say and perhaps offer some examples? Just a thought….
Click to expand...
There are at least three rude possibilities I see.

First one, I knew as child and I would be able to make pics, is a towel fixed by a belt, which may be part of it or just a belt and a towel separated. I see it as american native (indians as I called them then incorrectly), such as

americannative.jpg

It has not much of sexual apeal to me, but what the fuck, it might be interesting for a lot of people.

The second I know and many of you seem to prefer, which indeed is sexy, is the fundoshi type as it is in japan for both genders.

fundoshi-01-1.jpg

Naturaly, that shows your ass, which might be of value....

The third one you see on crucifixes of the catholic church and in your sauna, is like the towel wrapped around you, sometimes also around your bottom, but not necesary

badetuch.jpg

Naturaly in the female case, the towel must be very large and also cover the breast.

I personaly do not believe in loincloths of the above type of crucifixions, because for torture you should have at least contact with the cross by your butt and naturaly, most likely with the cornu and sedile.

So the maximum clothing on the cross is, if the penis has to be hidden, a jockstrap, since then your ass is accesible. Also one pic for that. One i did during the corona pandemie, it seems.

jock.jpg
 
Leonthebull said:
I've been playing around with some image ideas on carrying the cross. Is it better to see these men carry a full cross or just a cross bar? Also, is it better to see them marching naked or with a skimpy loincloth? I like the idea of a small loincloth; since when they reach the hill, it's more fun to rip off their coverings; stripping them naked right after they are nailed up.
Click to expand...
I like 2 and 5 for the provocative message, however all were done very nicely.
 
Leonthebull said:
I've been playing around with some image ideas on carrying the cross. Is it better to see these men carry a full cross or just a cross bar? Also, is it better to see them marching naked or with a skimpy loincloth? I like the idea of a small loincloth; since when they reach the hill, it's more fun to rip off their coverings; stripping them naked right after they are nailed up.
Click to expand...
Thank you but the attachments are broken for me, could you please repost them ?
 
dfg42 said:
There are at least three rude possibilities I see.

First one, I knew as child and I would be able to make pics, is a towel fixed by a belt, which may be part of it or just a belt and a towel separated. I see it as american native (indians as I called them then incorrectly), such as

View attachment 1533514

It has not much of sexual apeal to me, but what the fuck, it might be interesting for a lot of people.

The second I know and many of you seem to prefer, which indeed is sexy, is the fundoshi type as it is in japan for both genders.

View attachment 1533515

Naturaly, that shows your ass, which might be of value....

The third one you see on crucifixes of the catholic church and in your sauna, is like the towel wrapped around you, sometimes also around your bottom, but not necesary

View attachment 1533516

Naturaly in the female case, the towel must be very large and also cover the breast.

I personaly do not believe in loincloths of the above type of crucifixions, because for torture you should have at least contact with the cross by your butt and naturaly, most likely with the cornu and sedile.

So the maximum clothing on the cross is, if the penis has to be hidden, a jockstrap, since then your ass is accesible. Also one pic for that. One i did during the corona pandemie, it seems.

View attachment 1533517
Click to expand...
Thank you but the attachments are broken for me, could you please repost them ?
 
And here is my absolutely favorite painting of the crucifixion of Christ - this time absolutely unadulterated(!!!) - see my images on page 506. It's the painting "Lamentation Beneath The Cross" from the german painter of Renaissance Lucas Cranach the Elder (1472-1553). He created this, in visual arts rather unusual painting of the crucifixion of Christ in 1503. For the first time I saw this painting when I was twelve years old. I found it totally arousing even back then and I was totallyLamentation Beneath The Cross.jpg proud of my name - after all, my name is ALMOST the same! Until this day I'm really obsessed with this painting . . .
 
Last edited:
Hustler Jesus Chris said:
And here is my absolutely favorite painting of the crucifixion of Christ - this time absolutely unadulterated(!!!) - see my images on page 506. It's the painting "Lamentation Beneath The Cross" from the german painter of Renaissance Lucas Cranach the Elder (1472-1553). He created this, in visual arts rather unusual painting of the crucifixion of Christ in 1503. For the first time I saw this painting when I was twelve years old. I found it totally arousing even back then and I was totallyView attachment 1534918 proud of my name - after all, my name is ALMOST the same! Until this day I'm really obsessed with this painting . . .
Click to expand...
P.S.:

Yesterday I have forgotten the hint that you can today - if you want - marvel at the original of this painting in the museum of art "Alte Pinakothek" in Munich . . .
 
Hustler Jesus Chris said:
And here is my absolutely favorite painting of the crucifixion of Christ - this time absolutely unadulterated(!!!) - see my images on page 506. It's the painting "Lamentation Beneath The Cross" from the german painter of Renaissance Lucas Cranach the Elder (1472-1553). He created this, in visual arts rather unusual painting of the crucifixion of Christ in 1503. For the first time I saw this painting when I was twelve years old. I found it totally arousing even back then and I was totallyView attachment 1534918 proud of my name - after all, my name is ALMOST the same! Until this day I'm really obsessed with this painting . . .
Click to expand...
Unfortunately I don’t have a copy of it anymore, but my “first” crucifixion illustration that sent me over the edge as a youngster (aside from all the crucifixes hanging on the walls of my Roman Catholic friends homes) was a Children’s Bible published by Golden Press. Jesus was shown with bright blonde hair and blue eyes and a magnificent physique. Slender and slightly muscular, and the loincloth was portrayed as a very small, shredded cloth held in place by a rope, barely hanging on his hips and very close to showing his crotch. The thieves were similarly built physically, and their loincloths were just as skimpy, held in place by a rope hanging very low on their hips. A very arousing image for my young eyes at the time.
 
BondageBoy said:
Unfortunately I don’t have a copy of it anymore, but my “first” crucifixion illustration that sent me over the edge as a youngster (aside from all the crucifixes hanging on the walls of my Roman Catholic friends homes) was a Children’s Bible published by Golden Press. Jesus was shown with bright blonde hair and blue eyes and a magnificent physique. Slender and slightly muscular, and the loincloth was portrayed as a very small, shredded cloth held in place by a rope, barely hanging on his hips and very close to showing his crotch. The thieves were similarly built physically, and their loincloths were just as skimpy, held in place by a rope hanging very low on their hips. A very arousing image for my young eyes at the time.
Click to expand...
Ha, I guess that authors completely missed the point. In my view Jesus got crucified naked and the "loincloth" was invented to make the pics publicaly visible. It is still strange that you can show death (violent one, eg murder I mean) but no nudes. Loincloth and similar clothes might be more erotic than showing the nude body.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom