• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.

Crucifixion: Humiliation or demonstration of strength?

Go to CruxDreams.com
I think you have hit on something here, maybe without realizing it. You have hit on a key difference between a man and a woman crucified. You correctly identified that a man crucified is a symbol of strength, a sculpture of masculinity, physical strength and endurance. Although humiliated by his nudity, his big, whipped, sweaty hairy muscular outstretched body is showing how much he can take and how long he can defy the cross.

By contrast, a woman, while also humiliated by her nudity, and arguably more so, as while both genders crucified nude have genitals exposed, women also have boobs showing. But the woman, with her slender, smaller, shaved smooth elegant sexy body, baring whip marks and sweaty, is an enticing sex symbol, a symbol of beauty. She endures her cross and uses her strength to keep her beautiful body alive.

Both are admired, both are erotic, but in a different and almost opposite way.

I absolutely agree, and have been saying it here for over a decade.

https://www.cruxforums.com/xf/threads/crucified-males.158/post-42809

Men are strength, women are grace. We watch a crucified man for his strength, fighting the cross despite his power made helpless, his authority turned to vulnerability. We watch a woman for her beauty and grace in dancing with the cross, curves and softness in contrast to the straight unyielding wood. Her femininity calls to our compassion, her suffering tugs at our emotions, her body rouses our lust.
https://www.cruxforums.com/xf/threads/some-sketches.5721/post-329987

This is an interesting point, I've discussed it before. Men and women are different in many ways, and this is reflected in the experience of the cross. Perhaps many men see it as a challenge, as a battle, and many women see it as an ordeal or something to be endured, to submit to. Men are strength, women are grace
https://www.cruxforums.com/xf/threads/crucified-males.158/post-574584
 
Now, there is a detail that perhaps not everyone knows, in the Roman world it was very important for their religious beliefs, that a person touched the ground when he died, (or just after death). Any kind of death sentence that separated the victim from the ground was considered horrendous in itself, because the Romans had a strong connection with their religious beliefs.
 
I would like to know your opinion towards this topic, as we all know, crucifixion were extremely painful, expositive, shameful, the convict placed naked, being held by nails on the cross, for a crowd to watch him slowly defy.

The suffering is undeniably huge, but isn't it somehow admirable? Watching a condemned man, facing his crime, carrying his patibulum, and enduring the crucifixion, even though, against his will, isn't for you guys an exhibit of strength? Even pierced to the cross, body fully exposed, his crimes being shown on a sign, facing his condemnation, he is there, using all of his strength to survive and endure the crucifixion process.

My opinion is that, the crucifixion is painful, but not totally humiliating
In the real world obviously crucifixion was meant to humiliate and break people in both body and mind, and I imagine it perfectly reached those goals.
But I don't care about the real world: we are all here on a forum exploring our fantasies, so...

...in my own fantasy, crucifixion lies in a paradox.
For me, crucifixion thrives on these ambiguities (like other methods of execution and torture, it must be said).

On the one hand, it humiliates the condemned man/woman, exposes him/her naked to the gaze and even touch of anyone, just as he/she is most vulnerable and shocked by sharing with everyone such an intimate emotion as pain and fear of his own certain death approaching.

On the other hand, the condemned person may feel, to some extent, even proud that he/she is putting on a great show, which few give in their own lives (how many people are able to gather a crowd of hundreds, maybe thousands of people eager to witness their own performance? here it is...).
Yes, okay, he/she is naked and humiliated and in agony, but -- what if in being like this there is, after all, nothing really to be ashamed of? All that remains is the courage to do something very difficult and at the same time very attractive to the audience.


I will conclude with three citations, one from @DjEtla 's crucifixion stories "Lily on the cross" and "Melita on the cross" that can be easily found in this forum too: https://www.cruxforums.com/xf/threads/short-stories-by-djetla.7519/
Sidney kept up her light touches. “You’ll have a good crowd today.
We’ll set you up in a few minutes so you can start your little show,” Sidney said.
“I know this is scary. Maybe you can take some pride about doing something difficult. You’re going to do fantastic. People are going to fall in love with you – most of the men will … and maybe some of the women too.”
“You're going to do great,” the soldier said.
“What does that mean?” she asked. “You mean I'm going to suffer a long time?
“Well, yes,” he said cheerfully. “That's the point of a crucifixion, isn't it?
The third citation is from a 22 years old story (!), from writer "Iphigenia at Aulis" from bdsmlibrary.com (a website now in disarray, sadly), specifically "War and Peace". This one is not about crucifixion, specifically, but on the humiliation and pain.
But what if I tried the opposite strategy? What if I focused all my attention
on the sensation of pain? Yes, I would turn and face the pain directly, not
trying to run away from it, not trying to be somewhere else. ...Not wanting to
be somewhere else.
...Not wanting, period. ...Just being where I was.
Or even more simply, just being. ...Is that the distillation of my existence,
just being?

It's strange... or maybe not so strange. As I fully entered into that pain, it
ceased to be pain. Pleasant or unpleasant were only labels that my thoughts

might attach to a sensation. They were not the sensation itself. The sensation
itself had nothing to do with thought.

Time had stopped. Silence was utter. I looked around the room. Everyone's
eyes were fixed on me. One by one I fixed on them, each of the students,
individually. Were they different from me? ...They were free. I was bound.

They had comfort. I had pain. They were clothed, shielded. I was naked,
revealed. They were secure. I was vulnerable. But were they really separate

from me? Did my mind not encompass them all?
I hope these lines might be of... interest for someone, who likes the complexities of the mind, especially of a mind during a certain type of torture.

PS: most of my own fantasies involve a female victim (for instance, all those excerpts are about girls either crucified or tortured for all to see), but the general principles of my reasoning are perfect for a male victim's too, I think.
When I fantasize about men tortured and snuffed, I don't see them as a symbol of "strength" at all, at least not in the traditional strength.
Their strength is in surrendering to their role of "tortured performer" of an intriguing show, and this kind of "strength" can be shown by both male or female victims.
 
Last edited:
While I can imagine that some victims of crucifixion, say, opposing enemies captured alive in battle, may attempt to put on a show of bravado early in the process, but in a very short while would be completely submerged , both mentally and physically, in the sheer pain and utter futility of their situation, just merely hanging on (no pun intended) until their last mortal breath. In any event I do believe that after the first nail was driven all prior humiliation would be forgotten.
 
Last edited:
While I can imagine that some victims of crucifixion, say, opposing enemies captured alive in battle, may attempt to put on a show of bravado early in the process, but in a very short while would be completely submerged , both mentally and physically, in the sheer pain and utter futility of their situation, just merely hanging on (no pun intended) until their last mortal breath. In any event I do believe that after the first nail was driven all prior humiliation would be forgotten.

I like to imagine that the ordeal becomes a challenge for some individuals to do their best to endure and put on a brave performance, but I think you are right. During the Jewish Revolt those captured outside the walls of Jerusalem were crucified in sight of the walls to strike fear into the defenders - the sight can't have been encouraging. In the Kirk Douglas Spartacus film a Roman soldier is captured by the slave army and crucified facing the Romans. The purpose is clear, the victim is broken and suffering and a warning to others.
 
While I can imagine that some victims of crucifixion, say, opposing enemies captured alive in battle, may attempt to put on a show of bravado early in the process, but in a very short while would be completely submerged , both mentally and physically, in the sheer pain and utter futility of their situation, just merely hanging on (no pun intended) until their last mortal breath. In any event I do believe that after the first nail was driven all prior humiliation would be forgotten.
Personally, I often find the bravado a turn off for me.

Google says:

bravado
/brəˈvɑːdəʊ,brəˈveɪdəʊ/
noun
  1. a bold manner or a show of boldness intended to impress or intimidate.
    "he possesses none of the classic wheeler-dealer's casual bravado"
I personally hate and despise people in real life who tries to impress or intimidate.
That's rude, and I had my fair share of rude assholes in life, unfortunately.
The same holds in my sexual fantasies: in my fantasies I would never crucify naked a person trying to intimidate me, I would not deem him/her worthy of dying that way.
 
When I crucified by my Roman conquerors, I want to be completely humiliated and degraded. I want everyone to know that my land has been conquered and taken by those crucifying me, and their brutal treatment, use, and display of my vulnerable, violated, body, my very being, must serve as a reminder of their power and my people's defeat, shame, and weakness...! I absolutely must be viewed as not just a piece of fuckmeat on a cross, not just a crucified whore, but a prize that the Empire decided would be best used by giving the passerby both a nice sensual view of my body squirming in agony as well as a warning of the consequences of defiance and disobedience!
 
When I crucified by my Roman conquerors, I want to be completely humiliated and degraded. I want everyone to know that my land has been conquered and taken by those crucifying me, and their brutal treatment, use, and display of my vulnerable, violated, body, my very being, must serve as a reminder of their power and my people's defeat, shame, and weakness...! I absolutely must be viewed as not just a piece of fuckmeat on a cross, not just a crucified whore, but a prize that the Empire decided would be best used by giving the passerby both a nice sensual view of my body squirming in agony as well as a warning of the consequences of defiance and disobedience!
Well, the Romans were renowned for their thoroughness and efficiency, so I imagine that I'd the very thing that will happen to you!
 
Back
Top Bottom