Ain't that the truth, especially when Professor Bobinder starts in with his master classes on using masking and colour blending. I only hope I don't fail the end of term exams.
I was not sure that this was technically a Cruxton Abbey picture, since it's a manip of a painting, and not a typical Abbey scene. Sort of a fantasy of a fantasy really, in that sense. Perhaps it's an artist's conception of what might happen. It started as an idea from a painting by Sargent: "The Wyndham Sisters".
View attachment 811264
The three sisters were colourful characters in English high society in the late 19th and early 20th century. One was apparently happily married, but the other two sisters were famous for their sexual affairs - one was having an affair with the Prime Minister of the day, and the other was the mistress of the Foreign Secretary who took England into the First World War. I thought it would be interesting to reconceptualize the painting a bit.
"The Cruxton Sisters".
View attachment 811265
Make of it what you will, it seems to portray the Ladies Kathy, Barb and Katya relaxing after dealing with a "suitor" who didn't measure up (in some way
). Rumour has it there was a stable hand who wanted to play above his station, and was never heard from again. Historians have questioned whether this event actually ever took place, given the difficulties associated with cleaning blood out of the upholstery, and crucifixions at Cruxton were normally done outdoors. The artist, did portray the ladies as having removed their own clothing, possibly to show how clever they were to keep their dresses clean of bloodstains, but more likely because he liked painting naked ladies. Who knows what is true though, since it is documented that, when she spilled red wine on the carpet in one of the drawing rooms, Lady Barb was said to be dismissive and commented on how Lord Wragg would hardly be distressed, since the "rug" was from Persia (not even from the Empire of the day) and was "pretty old and in need of replacement."