willowfall
Senator
Yes I have a friend who has a Martini Henry that is chambered for the 577/450 cartridge, it truly is a beast and hurts more to shoot then the 505 Gibbs I had. LOL.
I was interested in your analysis as I have read that Stewart Grainger was well tutored in the british stage school of fencing and was one of the best of his time!
I agree, not a self defence style and he, like me, would likely die quickly in combat! Ok I would die quicker as he would know how to hold the sword!
Thanks for your patience and I shall trouble you no more on these matters.
BTW are you familiar with "By The Sword" by Richard Cohen. It is a history of sword fighting.
You can bother me whenever you like. I enjoy intellectual conversations and debates.
I haven't I might try to take a look at it. In general I am not fond of books that try to cover single subject like that over it's entire expanse. In this case, as far as I know, there are no extant manuals on sword fighting prior to Codex 133 which dates back to sometime in the early Middle Ages. And it, like most existing manuals, is more a dueling manual than a combat one. And lets say it was written in 1150 CE, then we are missing about 3000-4000 years of manuals on sword fighting when it REALLY mattered. So anything he writes about sword fighting prior to 1150-1200 CE is merely conjecture based on his prejudices. Not a bad thing and I'm not saying I'm smarter than he is but anything he states has to be taken with a grain of salt.
And of course no matter our love affair with the sword, with the exception of the Roman Republican\Imperial Army, it was never more than the second most important weapon in any army behind the polearm or occasionally the bow.
Which is why I'll take a good 8 ft. long oak or ash staff over any sword in existence.
kisses
willowfall