shevak2006
Governor
Bet they stay inflated no matter what the conditions...
Bet they stay inflated no matter what the conditions...
I assume you mean this pic?
View attachment 57492
A woman slowly losing her clothing as she hangs is wonderfully erotic.
A lovely thread to revisit!I love a man who knows how to strip a girl!
Wow! That is so incredibly erotic....I love a man who knows how to strip a girl!
Yes - Eulalia - I think that I do agree. It's nice to have a change from complete nudity now and then.The two pics of the woman in a short dress do it for me -the way her dress is lifted just to the pussy-line,and she can do nothing to stop it -it seems to me to emphasise her helplessness and accessibility even more than total nakedness -but I don't suppose men will agree?
I always want to have something against nudity!!!Yes - Eulalia - I think that I do agree. It's nice to have a change from complete nudity now and then.
Not that I have anything against nudity you understand.
Thank you! These are even better than the previous as they show more looking up her glorious thighs!!! Her pussy is just short of being on view, and there is nothing she can do about it!!!! She looks so innocent and helpless -- but probably deserves her crux for something she did. Poor little naughty girl! (Why couldn't they have picked a windy day for the shoot!!!????)My 2 cents worth - sometimes clothed is just fine. I like Shevak's proposal of the dress falling away slowly over time, it reminds me of a scene in the old crux story "The Punic Cross"
As you liked those 2 pics, here are more of the same series
Some older finds
I never thought you would use real nails!
Great from Dornier! More info about his work?Some more oldies
I found Dornier at The Dark Spot, but I think these were the only pics of interest. I'd like to see more.Great from Dornier! More info about his work?
Me too! thanksI found Dornier at The Dark Spot, but I think these were the only pics of interest. I'd like to see more.
Number one: waaauw!, great, is it yours?Some new finds
Number one is just beautiful, fantastic pic!Me too! thanks
Number one: waaauw!, great, is it yours?
Me too! thanks
Number one: waaauw!, great, is it yours?
I think we were too focused on the anatomy between the knees and the elbows, which the artist nailed! Well, you know what I mean!I just noticed on Cruxfoundation, where the thumbnails open as a fullsize window, that the feet on "Upside-Down-and-Hairy" are wrong. First, they look too much like hands. That's forgivable, feet are tough to draw. So are hands for that matter. But, they're also nailed wrong or the legs are too straight. If the feet were nailed flat against the crossbeam, the knees would have to be bent. The feet should be turned outward & nailed through the heels. It's a good picture otherwise which is probably why no one - including me - had noticed the mistake before.