You been misbehaving in Hamburg again?In this fascist state it’s apparently wrong
For a girl to be caught wearing a red thong
So it’s under arrest
My politics to test
I fear that they’ll break me before very long
You been misbehaving in Hamburg again?In this fascist state it’s apparently wrong
For a girl to be caught wearing a red thong
So it’s under arrest
My politics to test
I fear that they’ll break me before very long
I vote we whip her first, then question her again- her confession must be confirmed with some friendly, erm,I don't know Tree, maybe we should question her Moore just to be sure. We can always whip her later anyway.
At our Regime, it`s not clever to scoff,In this fascist state it’s apparently wrong
For a girl to be caught wearing a red thong
So it’s under arrest
My politics to test
I fear that they’ll break me before very long
Ahh, yes. An oldie but goodie.You been misbehaving in Hamburg again?
A red thong.... she must be a communist, make her talk, and after that make her disappear.In this fascist state it’s apparently wrong
For a girl to be caught wearing a red thong
So it’s under arrest
My politics to test
I fear that they’ll break me before very long
Sounds correct: blue state girl -> Commumist -> interrogated-> enemy of the state…A red thong.... she must be a communist, make her talk, and after that make her disappear.
Not my problem.That's the problem with torture. You can never be sure that the confession is true.
Well... shit happens.We don't want to condemn an innocent person, do we?
Ok.We have to take her and torture her to make her confess that the torture was extorted.
Dungeon logic made perfectly clear.If she resists, we know she told the truth.
But if she confesses, we know she is willing to lie under torture, so she may have lied about lying. So we have to torture her again, but then there's the same problem... and it has to go on endlessly...
You are looking at this in entirely the wrong way. If we are interrogating her, she must be guilty. Now we just have to determine what she is guilty of.That's the problem with torture. You can never be sure that the confession is true.
We don't want to condemn an innocent person, do we?
We have to take her and torture her to make her confess that the torture was extorted.
If she resists, we know she told the truth.
But if she confesses, we know she is willing to lie under torture, so she may have lied about lying. So we have to torture her again, but then there's the same problem... and it has to go on endlessly...
Wrong answer!MMMMPHHHHHH !!!!!!
"I suggest you think carefully, Miss Moore, and give me the names of your accomplices. There will be no turning back when I hand you over to my men, who will carry out a much more strenuous and painful interrogation, which you will not enjoy, although I am sure they will."
Old favorites of mine. Thanks for posting.
I think they want to see her writhe in agony first.It is hard for her to talk when she is gagged...
Interrogated naked as it should be.In the interrogation chamber. By DeviousDevAlco.
This is why we must be interrogated naked.View attachment 1556414 Interrogation in progress
Yes, only barefoot we are truly naked. For "interrogation " it is mandatory that we are stark naked and barefoot.I finally found it!
Gloria Mundi (1976 film) interrogation/torture scene with Olga Karlatos.
The part is about Olga's nude scenes in the film, the interrogation begins at 15:11
(I can't understand why they let this beauty wear her shoes.)