• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.

Obscene Display.

Go to CruxDreams.com
These models are trained professionals. Do not try this at home.

(I know, I know. More like Hardcore Display. Posted two years ago on the Foundation, artist unknown. Anybody?)
 

Attachments

  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    61.5 KB · Views: 1,143
  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    61.5 KB · Views: 1,202
These models are trained professionals. Do not try this at home.

(I know, I know. More like Hardcore Display. Posted two years ago on the Foundation, artist unknown. Anybody?)

At least she doesn't have to abrade her backside on the hard splintery wood of the cross.:rolleyes:
 
That was a LONG time ago, but there was an even earlier version that had a man on a cross in the background, and she pitched a fit when she saw that - didn't want a man on a cross in a picture with her. And according to her, crucifixion was primarily for women anyway back in Roman times. Lots of evidence to bear that out, of course.

That's Jedakk a few weeks ago, talking about one of his early renders I'd just posted. This is the earlier version over which Amber pitched said fit, along with the source image featuring the offending guy.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    140.6 KB · Views: 1,268
  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    118.1 KB · Views: 1,298
These models are trained professionals. Do not try this at home.

(I know, I know. More like Hardcore Display. Posted two years ago on the Foundation, artist unknown. Anybody?)

These marvellous pictures are by N8Dreams, who has many pictures here and at Crux Foundation. Well worth a trawl through the Search function.
 
At least she doesn't have to abrade her backside on the hard splintery wood of the cross.:rolleyes:

She has her backside on hard wood alright, I hope he's not splintering!

Here's an old one from cruxbitches, I think it qualifies as obscene display, though it looks fine to me :rolleyes:

IMG_1196.jpg
 
Here's an old one from cruxbitches, I think it qualifies as obscene display, though it looks fine to me :rolleyes:

View attachment 529382

Phlebas, Cruxbitches didn't so much qualify as obscene display as specialize in it. I've always had a soft spot, or rather a hard spot, for the site.
 
For Christmas a few years back Jastrow showed that when it comes to the Naughty list, Santa means business.

A reworked version left me puzzled, though. EREPTOR means 'robber.' But what on earth did she steal? Somebody's prom date?
 

Attachments

  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    1.5 MB · Views: 1,030
  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    1.4 MB · Views: 1,099
These renders date back to when Jastrow was using imaging software based on stone knives and bearskins.

Crude, but effective. And very well suited to this thread.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    272.5 KB · Views: 1,084
  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    92.2 KB · Views: 1,044
  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    172 KB · Views: 1,047
  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    382 KB · Views: 1,077
Sorry to leave you hanging so long, Mr. Tree.

Here's one by Damian I'd never seen before. I'm a T-cross kinda perv, but his X-cross really does obscenely display this unhappy lady in a thoroughly degrading and insanely erotic manner.

IMHO, that is. Your results may vary.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    276 KB · Views: 1,085
Sorry to leave you hanging so long, Mr. Tree.

Here's one by Damian I'd never seen before. I'm a T-cross kinda perv, but his X-cross really does obscenely display this unhappy lady in a thoroughly degrading and insanely erotic manner.

IMHO, that is. Your results may vary.
...but was a judge in the US that said "I can't define 'obscenity' but I know it when I see it"...

I have only liked what I have seen. Goodnight my friends...

T
 
...but was a judge in the US that said "I can't define 'obscenity' but I know it when I see it"...

I have only liked what I have seen. Goodnight my friends...

T

Is that along the same lines as "what you like is porn, what I like is erotica"?

These undoubtedly count as obscene display, and they are pretty wonderful - the degradation and shame are palpable
PS those thighs would keep her going on the cross for a good long time, fit looking girl!

a5.jpg k36.jpg k9.jpg mp3.jpg
 
These undoubtedly count as obscene display, and they are pretty wonderful - the degradation and shame are palpable

PS those thighs would keep her going on the cross for a good long time, fit looking girl!

View attachment 530457 View attachment 530458 View attachment 530459 View attachment 530460

Seems like her bladder will keep her going for a while as well. Urolagnia seems to be a common crux component.

So is sqeamishness, of all things. And some artists try to accommodate. For those grossed out by his lady's skewered breasts, Algabal furnished a skewerless version.

Jastrow got complaints too. People who get off on a naked girl nailed obscenely were outraged about what he did to that poor, poor kitty.

Chacun à son goût.
 

Attachments

  • image.gif
    image.gif
    372.3 KB · Views: 1,031
  • image.gif
    image.gif
    349.3 KB · Views: 1,060
  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    303.5 KB · Views: 1,127
  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    247.5 KB · Views: 1,123
Back
Top Bottom