• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.

Public display - Yes or no

Go to CruxDreams.com
Zephirantes said:
Yeah, for me the executee being diplayed in public is simply a must-have in all my snuff fantasies.
No point in carrying out an execution if it has to be private.

Also, I enjoy to imagine that the executee and the crowd interact somehow, like, with onlookers making compliments to the dying victims and so on.
I dislike the idea of an angry mob, on the contrary I fancy the idea of a caring and supportive crowd, that is there just because they want to see an exciting show but that otherwise bear the dying citim no ill will.

On this forum we have many examples of this kind, like for instance "Flavia crucified in Italica" by Carloscruz or "Lily / Sidney on the cross" by the excellent DjEtla.

Regarding this fantasy of mine, probably the crucifixion is the penalty allowing the most interaction between the crowd and the executee, due to the long time the victim has to spend on her death instrument.
Click to expand...
I truly agree with you. I too dislike the angry mob scenario. I enjoy the concept of a sympathetic crowd that relates to the victims suffering and is kind and caring admiring the victims strength in suffering through their ordeal but also find the victim erotic. So they wish the victims no ill will or suffering but enjoy the spectacle seeing everything of the victims helpless outstretched tortured naked bodies suffering which they as onlookers cannot control. They offer the victims moral support and encouragement and sympathy. Whereas the guards by contrast are uncaring, indifferent and callous but not sadistic. They do have a measure of respect for what the men and women they are charged with painfully setting and raising on their devices of agony and eventual death go through, they too see everything of these lashed, nude or near-nude, sweaty, heat-stroked, dehydrated half-aware poor things helplessly undergoing their fate.

But as I have often said on here, those with the most sympathy towards the victims are the exposed outstretched secured groaning panting glistening red whip-striped sweat-dripping bleeding straining suffering humiliated sexy men and women on the crosses either side of yours and around yours looking back at you, seeing everything of each other's outstretched exposed tortured bodies sharing your agony and talking through a bond known only to and shared between the crucified.
I only wonder how this bond may differ if between men, between women, between men and women, or even Transgenders. Would victims gender create any difference in the special bond between cross-mates?
 
My understanding is that Roman's reserved crucifixion for non-citizens involved in some form of rebellion. For a slave, attacking or failing to prevent an attack upon an owner, or an attempt to flee, fits the definition of rebellion. And nothing, absolutely nothing, rouses the slave-owning societal members more than rebellion. They HATED rebellious slaves (just read some of the contemporary accounts of Nat Turner's Rebellion, or John Brown's Harpers Ferry mess). It is a hatred born of fear, of course, but that makes the anger and loathing burn white-hot.

Thus, I imagine myself crucified, on public display as I writhe against the iron pinioning me to my cross, feeling the hateful glares and dimly hearing the catcalls and insults flung my way. The loathing of the crowd washes over me, reducing me to agonized despair; there is no mercy there. I am utterly alone and without hope in my agony. Reviled and despised, the onlookers drink in my shame and revel in my pain and impending death. To die publicly in such a state is, for me, total self-negation, and expiation for my life's failures and disasters.
 
Crucified Life said:
I too dislike the angry mob scenario. I enjoy the concept of a sympathetic crowd that relates to the victims suffering and is kind and caring admiring the victims strength in suffering through their ordeal but also find the victim erotic. So they wish the victims no ill will or suffering but enjoy the spectacle seeing everything of the victims helpless outstretched tortured naked bodies suffering which they as onlookers cannot control. They offer the victims moral support and encouragement and sympathy.
Click to expand...
Indeed : no an angry mob, rather a mocking mob,n who consider the gathering around the cross as a social event of talking and networking, while enjoying the spectacle, and the erotic aspect of it! Some have even sympathy for the crucified, and give them moral support;

Crucified Life said:
Whereas the guards by contrast are uncaring, indifferent and callous but not sadistic. They do have a measure of respect for what the men and women they are charged with painfully setting and raising on their devices of agony and eventual death go through, they too see everything of these lashed, nude or near-nude, sweaty, heat-stroked, dehydrated half-aware poor things helplessly undergoing their fate.
Click to expand...
I agree with the role of the guards too. During the night, they may even talk to the victims, to make their guard time pass.

Crucified Life said:
But as I have often said on here, those with the most sympathy towards the victims are the exposed outstretched secured groaning panting glistening red whip-striped sweat-dripping bleeding straining suffering humiliated sexy men and women on the crosses either side of yours and around yours looking back at you, seeing everything of each other's outstretched exposed tortured bodies sharing your agony and talking through a bond known only to and shared between the crucified.
Click to expand...
Yep!
Crucified Life said:
I only wonder how this bond may differ if between men, between women, between men and women, or even Transgenders. Would victims gender create any difference in the special bond between cross-mates?
Click to expand...
This is a very interesting question!
 
nailed girl said:
i think the suffering on the cross is also different like the body and mindset between woman and men..or transgender
Click to expand...
Do you think that women are more caring emotionally towards the victims on the cross next to them and men more indifferent? So two men might pretend to be ok on the cross, two women might be vulnerable and open to each other and a man and women together would be the woman getting the man to open up and be vulnerable? (Transgenders could fit in anywhere on that dynamic I have not yet figured that one out yet...)
 
nailed girl said:
no i think women and men are basicly different, emotional and physical
so the pain tolerance is different,in emotional pain and physical pain
Click to expand...
Women can take it better both physically and emotionally? (Which would be my bet...)
 
nailed girl said:
ok, woman are able to bear children, think a men will die for such pain:sisi3:
Click to expand...
So women make the better cross-mates as they encourage others to take the pain and agony both physically and emotionally better by the example they set with how they cope with their own suffering?
 
PhilX said:
Some time ago I thought crux clubs could be set up in various locations around the world, there is so much interest in this that the demand would be there. I imagined small groups of people to meet in isolated places (on land owned by one of the group perhaps), providing opportunities for folk who want to watch & those who want to be tied harmlessly to a cross for a safe amount of time, both sexes essential, the presence of women would ensure things wouldn't get out of hand. Privacy of personal identity was also vital, & wouldn't have been a difficulty.

However the presence now of mobile phones makes this idea hopeless, privacy of personal identity would be impossible to keep if things were videoed & put on social media. It's sad that a innocent idea for a bit of harmless erotic fun is destroyed by technology.
Click to expand...
Great idea and wonderful considerations. I apologize if, humbly, I intruded.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom