Frank Petrexa
Tribune
Yeah, I've heard that argument: John and Mark start the "day" at different times. (I'm surprised they don't claim the international date line used to run through Syria or something, or cite Antioch Daylight time.) But Mark is very clear that the room is "booked" on the "day the Pascal lamb is sacrificed", and after nightfall (new day) Jesus and the disciples eat a Passover meal. In John, the Jewish religious bigwigs will not go into the Praetorium to denounce Jesus because they would be "defiled" and unable to "eat the Passover" (which Mark says is already over). Pilate is still dithering about crucifying Jesus at the sixth hour in John. In Mark, he is crucified at the third hour, and darkness comes at the sixth hour. I guess you could argue that John supposedly wrote in Ephesus and Mark in Rome, and there was a lag. But as the late Raymond Brown (a Catholic priest and biblical scholar who believed the Bible says exactly what God wants it to say, warts and all) says, there is really no way to reconcile the two.Remember the day started at sunset. But there do indeed seem to be some chronological discrepancies between John and the Synoptics. There may have been some vagueness or confusion - just as there is in our own time about which when exactly Christmas starts, so which night is Twelfth Night.