Gibbs505
SERVORUM DOMITOR
Oh yes indeed!Indeed. Spare not the rod, as they say..
Oh yes indeed!Indeed. Spare not the rod, as they say..
Yes, corrective measures are definitely appropriate, preferably before the negotiation begins. Then theI believe in corrective methods
. I imagine it would be difficult to find a CruxForums member anywhere who wouldn’t want this to end with Ms Moore hanging naked on a cross
View attachment 1124445
I'm sorry. I jumped the gun there. We must proceed with a fair and impartial trial before we move on to the brutal punishment.
"I second that" !! I shout,from the packed Public Gallery, (to murmurs of assent....)I’m one, she should be permitted the dignity of a skimpy loincloth skirt, I suggest the one @markus gave her, after all it’s proven to be fit for purpose!
By all means. do proceed!”
Specifically : if it pleases the prosecution!Like a true Roman court: "If it pleases the court, it is justified."
oho think even worst bandit not will be wanna being accuse in court where white rodents jury decide
Jackie dances!Specifically : if it pleases the prosecution!
It is certainly pleasing the senior magistrate. I wonder whether my old eyes would be better seeing Jackie in my chambers?Like a true Roman court: "If it pleases the court, it is justified."
Objection! Testimonies should be public, for the whole court! Fairness of the trial is a primary concern for the prosecution!It is certainly pleasing the senior magistrate. I wonder whether my old eyes would be better seeing Jackie in my chambers?
Objection over-ruled, Mr Loxuru, I have little doubt that you had ample opportunity in your pre-trial 'coaching' of jackie1111 to ascertain her abilities, and I am obliged to ensure she understands the meaning of contempt of court. Only when the court is satisfied of her compliance, we can enjoy her public testimonies.Objection! Testimonies should be public, for the whole court! Fairness of the trial is a primary concern for the prosecution!
Is that public....or pubic?Objection over-ruled, Mr Loxuru, I have little doubt that you had ample opportunity in your pre-trial 'coaching' of jackie1111 to ascertain her abilities, and I am obliged to ensure she understands the meaning of contempt of court. Only when the court is satisfied of her compliance, we can enjoy her public testimonies.