Thomas Chaser
Tribune
I like the female's proportions on this one, but the male's chest and back aren't correct.
I like the female's proportions on this one, but the male's chest and back aren't correct.
I prefer the new style.Your old style was distinctively yours, your new style has greater realism but is less idiosyncratic.
At the end of the day you are the artist and you must do what you enjoy doing.
She says "no" but we say "YES! Please, Sir, may she have some more?"
No, not, the new style fascinates me and for me your work is one of the best, if not the best here!Is there anyone, at least one, who prefers my old style?
View attachment 1552827 View attachment 1552828
I way prefer the "old style". The speckled nature of the texture map (if that is what it is) gives the image a grittiness...a realism...a "lived in feel".... and a true sense of the participation of the girl in her own agony. She becomes a true object of her torturers' need to glut their cruelties on her. I was going to comment on this (without having seen the "new style") when I happened upon this post. I feel your older style even has a "barbaric smell" to it.Is there anyone, at least one, who prefers my old style?
View attachment 1552827 View attachment 1552828
Thank you for your feedback. Artist JD/John Doe called my images made in the old style “Speckled monstruosities”... Of course he has always hated them.I way prefer the "old style". The speckled nature of the texture map (if that is what it is) gives the image a grittiness...a realism...a "lived in feel".... and a true sense of the participation of the girl in her own agony. She becomes a true object of her torturers' need to glut their cruelties on her. I was going to comment on this (without having seen the "new style") when I happened upon this post. I feel your older style even has a "barbaric smell" to it.
(Your newer style is also great, but lacks the uniqueness and is therefore, less exotic. It is not for nothing that the spellings of "exotic" and "erotic" are so close.)
Edit: Would love to see you include intense male arousal (large rock hard erections) and perhaps the more forbidden themes incorporated in your older style.
Good! That's what I like to hear.
"Of course we'll stop it. Just as soon as we grow bored with your screams."
“Speckled monstrosities” Are you sure it was not a compliment? Consider the context.Thank you for your feedback. Artist JD/John Doe called my images made in the old style “Speckled monstruosities”... Of course he has always hated them.
That was not a compliment.“Speckled monstrosities” Are you sure it was not a compliment? Consider the context.
Certainly, but poor tastes can often be changed by reconditioning or reprogramming.That was not a compliment.
by doe.1971: "A belated thank you for giving up on those speckled monstrosities. Much more aesthetically appealing now. Before, I would turn tail as soon as seeing your name on board."
Everyone has his or her own taste.
I can't speak for everyone, Michele, but I think the new style is better. The image is much clearer.Is there anyone, at least one, who prefers my old style?
View attachment 1552827 View attachment 1552828