• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.

Tortured Women

  • Thread starter Deleted member 16647
  • Start date
Go to CruxDreams.com
lol
'Military' punishment in a fantasy RAF !
Beautiful thighs.
A detail :
'Flight officer' is not an existing grade, it's a title, a function.
'Flying officer' = 'lieutenant' in the Army, "Flight lieutenant' = 'captain'. These grades were created and named so by analogy with the Navy.

 
Pierre771 said:
lol
'Military' punishment in a fantasy RAF !
Beautiful thighs.
A detail :
'Flight officer' is not an existing grade, it's a title, a function.
'Flying officer' = 'lieutenant' in the Army, "Flight lieutenant' = 'captain'. These grades were created and named so by analogy with the Navy.

Click to expand...
Something tells me these women might not actually be in the RAF...unless that stands for Red Ass Females.:D
 
Pierre771 said:
Very nice and beautiful young couple making love (vaginal intercourse).
'Mormon', I don't understand why the precision is useful...
No torture

Click to expand...

The guy is dressed like Mormon boys do when they have to do their two-year "missionary" obligation where they knock on doors and try to spread the word, mostly being a pain in the ass. They wear a name tag just he has on that says they are "Elder James" or whatever, no last name. So that's what this video is about, a fantasy where a Mormon missionary is getting it on with a girl who may also be Mormon.
 
jedakk said:
The guy is dressed like Mormon boys do when they have to do their two-year "missionary" obligation where they knock on doors and try to spread the word, mostly being a pain in the ass. They wear a name tag just he has on that says they are "Elder James" or whatever, no last name. So that's what this video is about, a fantasy where a Mormon missionary is getting it on with a girl who may also be Mormon.
Click to expand...
Super.
Thanks for the precision.
I don't know this Church in detail (I knew the two years missionary) but I guess sex is strictly, obsessionaly probihited as in all branches of Christianism...
And let's not talk about lesbian sex with 2 or 3 girls...
 
Pierre771 said:
Super.
Thanks for the precision.
I don't know this Church in detail (I knew the two years missionary) but I guess sex is strictly, obsessionaly probihited as in all branches of Christianism...
And let's not talk about lesbian sex with 2 or 3 girls...
Click to expand...

I wouldn't say that sex is strictly, obsessively prohibited in all branches of Christianity. Sex outside of marriage is discouraged, but nobody really obsesses over it. Everyone except for a very small minority pretty well accepts that almost no one in today's western society, no matter how seriously they may take their religion, is going to wait until they are married to have sex with each other. Two people meet at church, it would be accepted that after a couple of dates they are probably having sex and no one is going to even mention that.

Lesbian/gay sex, multiple partners, promiscuity, yeah, any branch of Christianity will frown on those.
 
Well, it's arguable whether the Church of the Latter Day Saints (Mormons) is a branch of Christianity.
If it is, The Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) is much more so, and they celebrate same-sex marriages in UK,
and at least in some branches in USA. As do some Episcopalians.
It's a sweeping caricature to view the Church(es) historically as obsessively prohibitive,
and impossible to judge whether things would have been different if Christianity hadn't become the main religion in Europe,
it was a major part of the 'ideological apparatus' of beliefs and attitudes that held societies more or less together,
like God, if it hadn't existed, someone would have had to invent it.
Bear in mind that, until very recently (the last 50 years?), 'having sex' always meant a serious risk of unwanted pregnancy.
 
Eulalia said:
Well, it's arguable whether the Church of the Latter Day Saints (Mormons) is a branch of Christianity.
If it is, The Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) is much more so, and they celebrate same-sex marriages in UK,
and at least in some branches in USA. As do some Episcopalians.
It's a sweeping caricature to view the Church(es) historically as obsessively prohibitive,
and impossible to judge whether things would have been different if Christianity hadn't become the main religion in Europe,
it was a major part of the 'ideological apparatus' of beliefs and attitudes that held societies more or less together,
like God, if it hadn't existed, someone would have had to invent it.
Bear in mind that, until very recently (the last 50 years?), 'having sex' always meant a serious risk of unwanted pregnancy.
Click to expand...

The Shakers were the only ones who absolutely prohibited sex. Which is a large reason why there are only 2 left, both very elderly women. I know most of you read the story I wrote about Ann Lee, the founder, but for those who didn't, it's here and it's based on the actual history of the sect, with a few liberties taken and acknowledged. http://www.cruxforums.com/xf/threads/the-real-historical-female-jesus.5775/
 
The Cathars had interesting ideas:
Basic Cathar Tenets led to some surprising logical implications. For example they largely regarded men and women as equals, and had no doctrinal objection to contraception, euthanasia or suicide. In some respects the Cathar and Catholic Churches were polar opposites. For example the Cathar Church taught that all non-procreative sex was better than any procreative sex. The Catholic Church taught - as it still teaches - exactly the opposite. Both positions produced interesting results. Following their tenet, Catholics concluded that masturbation was a far greater sin than rape (as mediaeval penitentials confirm). Following their principles, Cathars could deduce that sexual intercourse between man and wife was more culpable than homosexual sex. (Catholic propaganda on this supposed Cathar proclivity gave us the word bugger, from Bougre, one of the many names for medieval Gnostic Dualists)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom