For all of you who think the victim can't be raped if the feet are nailed first:
Ok, I'm a believer now
For all of you who think the victim can't be raped if the feet are nailed first:
...and don't forget the lubricantFor all of you who think the victim can't be raped if the feet are nailed first:
Exellently!For all of you who think the victim can't be raped if the feet are nailed first:
Erm, for what it's worth, 'Rectus' and 'Rectinus' are perfectly valid cognomina that used to be rather popular in Roman Spain."Imbecilius Rectus"
Those Roman expletives are even better than "Biggus Dickus".
Where there's a will, there's a wayFor all of you who think the victim can't be raped if the feet are nailed first:
my answer with an old master's example and a belate wish
That would give pleasure to both executioner and victim i think. Kissing a beautiful pair of soles before nailing them would really get me off.Given the fact I'd want to kiss my victim's feet to no end, I had to vote wrists.
feet nailed individually is much more easier for the executioners, it will be a slower torture for the victim and the genitals are visible in an obscene display if the thighs are straddled. If the feet are nailed directly to the stipes with toes showing downwards, the victim will get muscle cramps each time when stretching the legs.One nail for the feet or feet nailed individually?
As 'naildance' points out, nailing feet individually is more shameful for victims as their legs are somewhat splayed, exposing their intimate areas to public display.One nail for the feet or feet nailed individually?