• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.

INTERROGATION

Go to CruxDreams.com
From an Argentinian production Desparecidos, posting some pics over the next few days

1 of 3 - stripped for questioning

desparacidos 0.jpgdesparacidos 1.jpgdesparacidos 2.jpgdesparacidos 3.jpgdesparacidos 4.jpg
 
From an Argentinian production Desparecidos, posting some pics over the next few days

1 of 3 - stripped for questioning

View attachment 1243741View attachment 1243740View attachment 1243739View attachment 1243738View attachment 1243737

Sorry for my silly "smartass question", but if this is an Argentinian production, why is the subtitle "Spettacolo Integrale" in Italian language and why are then the actors in my version speaking Italian without being synchronized? :

Ashampoo_Snap_Dienstag, 18. Oktober 2022_23h01m15s_001_.jpg
 
Sorry for my silly "smartass question", but if this is an Argentinian production, why is the subtitle "Spettacolo Integrale" in Italian language and why are then the actors in my version speaking Italian without being synchronized? :

View attachment 1243895

The answer to that Silent Water could be that I am talking out of my arse and completely wrong! Let me then say that it is an Argentinian setting, I think that would be correct?

With onstage bondage and nudity this actress is really committing. I wonder how she feels, is it just a performance or does she inhabit the role, find something thrilling in it?

Next 5 - questioned

desparacidos 5.jpgdesparacidos 6.jpgdesparacidos 7.jpgdesparacidos 8.jpgdesparacidos 9.jpg
 
With onstage bondage and nudity this actress is really committing. I wonder how she feels, is it just a performance or does she inhabit the role, find something thrilling in it?

I think, I once read something about the British actress Kate Radford who once played the victim of a "pau de arara" - torture in a theatre and she said, something like playing being tortured is never just a performance because of this extreme feeling of humiliation and degradation. She did it in a feeling of solidarity with the women who were victims in reality - probably similar to the women who are now publicly cutting their hair in solidarity with the women in Iran - and she did it because she wanted the audience to be shocked by seeing "live on stage" what happened and still happens in dictatorships and similar regimes while many European governments were and are still having good relations with such dictatorships as long as they are good economic partners and "stay at home" with their cruelties.
 
I think, I once read something about the British actress Kate Radford who once played the victim of a "pau de arara" - torture in a theatre and she said, something like playing being tortured is never just a performance because of this extreme feeling of humiliation and degradation. She did it in a feeling of solidarity with the women who were victims in reality - probably similar to the women who are now publicly cutting their hair in solidarity with the women in Iran - and she did it because she wanted the audience to be shocked by seeing "live on stage" what happened and still happens in dictatorships and similar regimes while many European governments were and are still having good relations with such dictatorships as long as they are good economic partners and "stay at home" with their cruelties.

Very interesting observation. It must be a powerful experience, one way or another.

The last screenshots including a different girl, and a link.

desparacidos10.jpgdesparacidos11.jpgdesparacidos12.jpgdesparacidos13.jpg
 
Very interesting observation. It must be a powerful experience, one way or another.

The last screenshots including a different girl, and a link.

View attachment 1244183View attachment 1244182View attachment 1244181View attachment 1244180

The play is based on the author's experiences as a "guest" of the Argentinian government. So yes, it is an Argentinian setting and probably an Italian performance. To add to the comments about the actress playing the victim, I have a friend in theater and she says it is just as bad for the men playing the villains. The worse the act they have to commit (and the more convincing her performance) the more guilty they feel, even if it is just pretend. In some ways, she relishes the challenge of the role - physical and mental - and the attention she receives as a result. It can crystalize the actor's motivation for being in theater.
 
Interrogations are awesome. In fact, while they're not my main fetish/fantasy (that would be lifelong slavery), I rank it above crux, because it emphasizes the utter helplessness of the captive and the knowledge that anything can and will be done to make her suffer until her tormentor is satisfied.

A good interrogation scene, I think, should be intimate. There shouldn't be more people involved other than the interrogator and his victim. I suppose you can have other people involved to restrain her, place electrodes or other torture devices on the victim, or so on, but I feel the interrogator can do that himself, and having just the two involved creates a sense of perverse intimacy, in which secrets - and I don't mean state secrets or whatever she's interrogated for - are revealed, a certain relationship slowly builds between them.

Other elements that contribute, in my opinion, to a great interrogation scene:

Electricity and plenty of it. Yes, there are other tortures, but electricity is so brutal and terrifying, you instinctively empathize with the victim. All of us know what it's like, even if only for static shocks. We can take that horrible sudden pain and, in our mind, enlarge and lengthen it, and we understand what the victim is going through.

The victim being gagged in the beginning, and for long stretches of time, while she is being tormented. She should understand that she is being shown what can be done to her right from the start, and perhaps make her wonder if her captors even intend to ask her any questions, or are just taking sadistic advantage of their ultimate power over her.

The interrogator being calm, cool, and collected at all times. He shouldn't have to yell - she is at his mercy and isn't going anywhere. She should be the one desperate to get it over with. Whether he is enjoying himself or just putting in a day's work, he's not under any pressure. Rather he is the one inflicting the pressure. Even if and when the two become closer and her personal life are revealed to him, he should stay focused and not say too much. Just ask pointed questions and occasionally make an observation that makes the victim doubt herself and everything she thought she knew about life.
 
A good interrogation scene, I think, should be intimate. There shouldn't be more people involved other than the interrogator and his victim. I suppose you can have other people involved to restrain her, place electrodes or other torture devices on the victim, or so on, but I feel the interrogator can do that himself, and having just the two involved creates a sense of perverse intimacy, in which secrets - and I don't mean state secrets or whatever she's interrogated for - are revealed, a certain relationship slowly builds between them.

I tend to agree with you, but there is an interesting aspect to consider when an interrogation is happening in front of several unknown people. I'm specifically talking about the shame element, the mocking the victim is subjected to - for example the comments about physical appearance and helplessness - and the sexual threat that a group of people implies.
 
Back
Top Bottom