• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.

Condemned’s AI Art

Go to CruxDreams.com
What prompts are you feeding to the A.I. programme?


@bobinder, we are not in Kansas anymore. Oh brave new world, that has such pictures in it.
It's only a year or so ago that AI crux art was pretty crude. Now the sky really seems to be the limit, and on top of almost photo real 3D art as well I fear there is little room for our traditional photomanips. It all starts to blend together.
 
@bobinder, we are not in Kansas anymore. Oh brave new world, that has such pictures in it.
It's only a year or so ago that AI crux art was pretty crude. Now the sky really seems to be the limit, and on top of almost photo real 3D art as well I fear there is little room for our traditional photomanips. It all starts to blend together.
Tree is not learning AI... there will be manips!!!
 
@bobinder, we are not in Kansas anymore. Oh brave new world, that has such pictures in it.
It's only a year or so ago that AI crux art was pretty crude. Now the sky really seems to be the limit, and on top of almost photo real 3D art as well I fear there is little room for our traditional photomanips. It all starts to blend together.
This is my thought. I'm quite happy to continue with photoshopping manips, but I do see how AI can be a nice tool in the toolbox. An advance in media technology rarely kills off all the old forms completely.
 
This is my thought. I'm quite happy to continue with photoshopping manips, but I do see how AI can be a nice tool in the toolbox. An advance in media technology rarely kills off all the old forms completely.
Very much agree. There is no way I could do some of the stuff talented folks on this site create with PS and 3D programs. To me, AI is just another tool to get to a secific outcome. Without exact input it's mostly garbage output. I think manips and traditional art will still very much continue to exist but will likely leverage AI to assist and speed the process. Art is very much a human creation. AI is not changing that. Just allowing us to harness the power of our machines in new ways. I think we + AI will become more than the sum of our parts similar to how a car becomes an extension of a racers body. Neither can accomplish the result without the other.

But I digress, here's some kinky pics... :lol:
 

Attachments

  • test76.jpg
    test76.jpg
    115.5 KB · Views: 1,578
  • test75.jpg
    test75.jpg
    107.8 KB · Views: 1,266
  • test74.jpg
    test74.jpg
    92.2 KB · Views: 1,237
Another exciting milestone! Finished training my first LoRA to assist with hand position, blood, nails, etc. Granted, this is an early attempt but this is default output without any inpainting or touchups on hands/feet. Lots to learn and tweak in the training process but super excited for future results. Also, no refence img needed to generate this one!
 

Attachments

  • test77.jpg
    test77.jpg
    101.1 KB · Views: 1,282
My attempts at realism have not been great. Working on getting a bit closer to my prior aesthetic.

I think you're doing fine! One thing that is often missing from AI crux is nails. I took the liberty of adding them to your pic test71, which I love. I also added a subtle hint of ginger pubic hair because, well, ginger pubic hair!

phtest71.jpg
 
Starting to experiment with more characters in a scene in SDXL and trying a couple turbo models.

I do like this painterly style you have hit on, and these new scenes with background figures are working quite well, the figures in 92 and 91 are more believable than you tend to get from the equivalent 3D scenes. AI "artifacts" are present, 90 has a man missing his left arm, and the foreground girl in 89 has a typical AI problem with her hand, but I think your experiments with these pictures are very worth while.

It is truly amazing how far we have come with these images in a year or so.
 
Back
Top Bottom