Another example would be the Anna Amalia Library in Weimar ... a much younger and smaller building than Notre Dame, it's from the late 1600's
At the turn of the 21st century curators decided there wasn't enough room for manuscripts and reading / research rooms, and the library was no longer a safe place for the existing volumes
... so a renovation and extension was started in 2002, planned to take 2-3 years...
... towards the end of it, in 2004, the library burnt down... with the loss of many unique volumes
... the fire started in the roof construction ...
... it's assumed the cause was electrical although it was never precisely determined.
It seems ironic that many such buildings stood and safeguarded their contents, for centuries, and then succumbed to modern improvement efforts.
The problem is of course that they were slowly decaying, and it was the fear that this would cause catastrophe, that prompted the renovations.
We can't just assume they would have stood forever if nothing had been done ...
... and any change ever done, comes with some risk.
There will just have to be even more care taken in the future.
Anyway, what with the international competition for the roof/spire replacement, we are seeing some more of what the modern architectural profession is up to ... this from Norman Foster, no surprise...
... see also
https://archpaper.com/2019/04/foster-partners-pitches-notre-dame-spire-competition/