There a lots of ways to show if a victim is willing:
In post #158, we knew the victims were willing by the expressions on their faces or by their actions.
In #154, the victim's word's in the accompanying text showed how willing, indeed eager, she was.
In #155, thought bubbles and / or dialogue boxes revealed what they were really thinking, regardless of expression.
However, #155 is also an example of yet another way to show / know if a victim is willing.
Are they Crux Forum's member's? If so, the only logical assumption is willing.
Some examples:
Now, this victim does not appear willing, but we know
@Barbaria1 loves complaining almost as much as she loves bondage / torture / crucifixion so, assume willing.
One might assume these women being sold into slavery are not terribly happy with the prospect, but the name of at least one of them tells us otherwise.
See, it's easy.
Below,
@Eulalia , who's the Chief Hostess of Crux Park, is checking in
@Possum and
@willowfall for their afternoon's recreational crucifixion.
Eul is kneeling because she's on the phone with her master.
@Loinclothslave (in his female persona during a dream) has just had a big O on the cross.
@Kathy has never been known to pass up a free crucifixion.
Now, the other member in the picture above is not, technically, a victim, so I'm not sure of her willingness status.
But, put her on a cross, and she might even make the cover of Crux Park's new brochure:
Here, we have a trifecta of willingness with
@Jackie1111
Crucified member, smiling, talking about enjoying the attentions of a new friend.
@messaline is not exactly smiling below, but we know, don't we?
We don't even have to see the faces to infer willingness. We know three of the butts trudging up the hill are Barb, Eul, and Messa. Enough said.
Finally, Barb, Eul, Kathy, and Messa enjoying the afternoon sunshine.
So, if ever you post a pic of a member, don't worry, we'll all just assume willingness.