We do have a policy here that a member should have only one account and one identity at CF. This is normally the case. I, for example, have one account which I share with my alter ego (the one who writes in all caps). This should be the norm (having one account, not necessarily having multiple personalities).
While we, the staff, do not intend to go stomping all over the place with our heavy boots (right, what's all this then? FTANG, FTANG!!), we do ask people to respect the rules and policies. They are there to ensure a friendly and fair forum for everyone.
NOW, EVERYONE JUST TRY TO GET ALONG AND BEHAVE LIKE GOOD DEGENERATES, WOULD YOU? THIS ADMINISTRATION STUFF IS EXHAUSTING.
That lazy git,
@Wragg , currently 'indisposed' due to having sent
@Barbaria1 down to the Cruxton Abbey wine cellars about fourteen times today, has given me permission to reply...
Well, at least, I think it was permission... he said, 'Schpike, Old Boy, get down to the Fuxcrorums and tell them about pultimul.... miltupul... tell them about you an me, will ya?'
First of all, as
@Jollyrei says, the rules do now state 'one member, one account' - see
https://www.cruxforums.com/xf/threads/rules-of-crux-forums.9896/post-724571 (although the link at bottom right hasn't been updated yet.)
In my case, old Wragg invented me a few years ago (before he was a mod) to act as a reporter on the Crux Chronicle, then regretted it when I revealed that he's a lazy bastard who never did an honest day's work in his life....
But as a bit of fun, or to act as a foil in stories it's okay, if anyone thinks I'm anyone other than Wragg then I apologise!
Those who have been around the forums for a while may recall a member who took on the identity of a girl just turned 18, and who played the long game, forming multiple friendships on the forums before announcing that 'she' had incurable cancer. Many members were truly upset by this and then furious when 'she' was unmasked as a fake. That was plain, nasty, deception.
More recently, the moderators have been trying to consult each other before hitting the ban button, and will only issue an instant ban in serious cases, such as child pornography. Deception such as the example above resulted in a ban then, and would now. But sometimes it is appropriate to engage a member in a conversation, and, so we (
@Barbaria1, actually - when Wragg gave her some time off) did inform Kathy by pm that it is not acceptable to use these multiple IDs in this way.
The result you see here. Kathy has apologised unreservedly, and I for one am happy to accept that apology.