xxxmike
Spectator
Ouoom, "Fate of a Spy". (4) Perfect! Qoom is a great artist.
Ouoom, "Fate of a Spy". (4) Perfect! Qoom is a great artist.
What will happen to her during the interrogation? I love these scenes. They give room for so many fantasies...Taken from her cell for interrogation. Pasha1970.
could you please give me this YouTube link? Thanks.From the documentary "Argentina's Dirty War" on YouTube.
Thanks PeterVI! I saw it when it came out, and since then it has remained a Cult!I finally found it!
Gloria Mundi (1976 film) interrogation/torture scene with Olga Karlatos.
The part is about Olga's nude scenes in the film, the interrogation begins at 15:11
(I can't understand why they let this beauty wear her shoes.)
I'd seen it at a film club back in the '90s and the scene had stuck with me. I don't know how I remembered it, I guess I really liked this chick and her stubbornness in the role.I saw it when it came out
I'm sorry, but I thought that, in the case of Quoom, since he unfortunately passed away and his site has not been updated for years, it could be done. Also, the series was not complete anyway!I'm sorry to have to do this, but I've deleted all except the first part of the Quoom series. Our Rules don't allow reproducing whole series that available on the creator's own website, as is the case with Quoom.
I was thinking the same thing. But BDSM Artwork probably 'owns' his work, even though there won't be any more updates from him. I would think since Quoom is no longer able to reap the rewards of his work, and knowing that BDSM Artwork is now exploiting his name with other artist's work, that the 'pay site rules' here could be relaxed as far as his work is concerned. But that's just my opinion, and I will, of course, defer the mods decision.I'm sorry, but I thought that, in the case of Quoom, since he unfortunately passed away and his site has not been updated for years, it could be done. Also, the series was not complete anyway!
Bear in mind our primary focus is in reducing site costs associated with memory over-runs. We’ve been facing rising costs fairly consistently on a month to month basis. Thank goodness for our voluntary contributors who routinely help the forum every month.I was thinking the same thing. But BDSM Artwork probably 'owns' his work, even though there won't be any more updates from him. I would think since Quoom is no longer able to reap the rewards of his work, and knowing that BDSM Artwork is now exploiting his name with other artist's work, that the 'pay site rules' here could be relaxed as far as his work is concerned. But that's just my opinion, and I will, of course, defer the mods decision.
Wow! That's great!I finally found it!
Gloria Mundi (1976 film) interrogation/torture scene with Olga Karlatos.
The part is about Olga's nude scenes in the film, the interrogation begins at 15:11
(I can't understand why they let this beauty wear her shoes.)
I understand that. But if he's posting according at the 5 per thread per day limit, what difference does it make if the images are Quoom's or someone elses as long as the artist is no longer publishing?Bear in mind our primary focus is in reducing site costs associated with memory over-runs. We’ve been facing rising costs fairly consistently on a month to month basis. Thank goodness for our voluntary contributors who routinely help the forum every month.
So even if copyright wasn’t an issue, it costs the site to host entire series, and overall isn’t this website’s stated purpose.
Obviously sharing images is a part of what makes cruxforums enjoyable unfortunately it is also a costly one. Our motivation is not to curtail people’s enthusiasm- which we love- but only to control our collective costs.
There are still potential copyright issues. But the main consideration is that posting complete series, or substantial parts of series, even keeping within the 5-a-day and not >400KB parameters, is likely to run up greater excess usage charges than posting thoughtfully selected 'found' images that are likely to appeal to CF members. CruxForums simply isn't, and can't any longer afford to be, a site where whole series, or bulk collections of images, can be housed and added to daily. So we're trying to discourage members from posting images in maximum numbers even within the allowed limits, but rather to use the site to share good quality, selected content in smaller quantity, so that it can be enjoyed and prompt discussion and fantasy.I understand that. But if he's posting according at the 5 per thread per day limit, what difference does it make if the images are Quoom's or someone elses as long as the artist is no longer publishing?
Not trying to be argumentative, just want to clarify that in my own mind.
While I completely agree with Wulf (thanks for the support!), I will stick, as is right, to the indications of the forum moderators, and will only publish scattered images of the various authors that I love. The forum is really a very pleasant place to share our fantasies, and it is right that we all make an effort to keep it alive and healthy!There are still potential copyright issues. But the main consideration is that posting complete series, or substantial parts of series, even keeping within the 5-a-day and not >400KB parameters, is likely to run up greater excess usage charges than posting thoughtfully selected 'found' images that are likely to appeal to CF members. CruxForums simply isn't, and can't any longer afford to be, a site where whole series, or bulk collections of images, can be housed and added to daily. So we're trying to discourage members from posting images in maximum numbers even within the allowed limits, but rather to use the site to share good quality, selected content in smaller quantity, so that it can be enjoyed and prompt discussion and fantasy.
Thanks - that's appreciated. We wish we didn't have to be restrictive, and are very grateful to the members who help us to keep up the enjoyable content and atmosphere of the Forums while keeping the costs sunder control.While I completely agree with Wulf (thanks for the support!), I will stick, as is right, to the indications of the forum moderators, and will only publish scattered images of the various authors that I love. The forum is really a very pleasant place to share our fantasies, and it is right that we all make an effort to keep it alive and healthy!
Ok, that makes sense and I get it. And for the record I very much agree with the last sentence.There are still potential copyright issues. But the main consideration is that posting complete series, or substantial parts of series, even keeping within the 5-a-day and not >400KB parameters, is likely to run up greater excess usage charges than posting thoughtfully selected 'found' images that are likely to appeal to CF members. CruxForums simply isn't, and can't any longer afford to be, a site where whole series, or bulk collections of images, can be housed and added to daily. So we're trying to discourage members from posting images in maximum numbers even within the allowed limits, but rather to use the site to share good quality, selected content in smaller quantity, so that it can be enjoyed and prompt discussion and fantasy.
try to keep <400KB - this one is only just over, but it all adds to our usage costsThe young blonde screamed in agony when her interrogator shoved an electric cattle prod up her vagina.