• Sign up or login, and you'll have full access to opportunities of forum.

Judicial Corporal Punishment Of Women: Stories And Novels

Go to CruxDreams.com
Manda Scott’s 3,000-page epic Boudica, conveniently separated into four consecutive tomes, tells the story of Celtic noblewoman Breaca, who rose up against Roman occupation and received the eponymous title “Bringer of Victory”. Of course, one biographical key scene is not amiss, either: After the death of her husband Breaca is brutally flogged by order of the Roman tax collector.



Not yet. This is the beginning. The rest will be worse; don’t bring it sooner.

She could not imagine worse. This much was more than she could bear. She opened her mouth and breathed in hot, sweating air and---

Not yet.

She closed her mouth and choked on sweat and old spit and somewhere, somebody laughed and she remembered that they could see her and for a moment, she took the weight on her legs, not her arms, and pressed her forehead to the oak and made the feel of it count against the stunning, blinding, nauseating, endless, endless, endless pain.

A blaze of lightning struck her arms, above her head, and she forgot about her weight and slumped against the ties and the lightning struck her back again, adding pain to infinite pain and the oak was gone and all sense of safety and she opened her mouth and took a breath---


The flogging is almost entirely depicted from Breaca’s point of view, and in a somewhat detached style as she drifts in and out of visions of a shamanic entity that guides her through her battles.

The novel sports a very captivating writing style and an enormous supply of historical knowledge, especially when it comes to Roman military. As to be expected with the choice of the protagonist, the story incorporates feministic motifs throughout its unfolding. However, the women are strong in their own rights, not being elevated by turning every male counterpart into a misogynistic villain or an incompetent fool. Come to think of it, there’s almost no character without some interesting or redeeming qualities about him or her – apart from the misogynistic, incompetent tax collector.
 
Tiredny said:
Just happened to stumble upon this:

Corporal Punishment of Women

There is a preview button where you can see chapter headings. Has anyone read this?

If so, is it any good?

Regards,
Tired
Click to expand...
It's interesting that, out of 16 who 'are reading' or intending to read it, at least 6 are women, 2 or 3 more could well be.

Geoffrey Pimm is a fairly serious historian, I've seen 'The Dark Side of Samuel Pepys - Society's first Sex Offender' reviewed reasonably favourably, and I see he's also written 'The Violent Abuse of Women in 17th and 18th century Britain' - 'Corporal Punishment of Women' is on offer on all the mainstream internet dealers' sites, it's evidently not just under-the-counter-porn. I guess Praefectus Praetorio would have enjoyed them - though he seemed pretty knowledgeable about the subject anyway, I think he could have written them!
 
Eulalia said:
It's interesting that, out of 16 who 'are reading' or intending to read it, at least 6 are women, 2 or 3 more could well be.

Geoffrey Pimm is a fairly serious historian, I've seen 'The Dark Side of Samuel Pepys - Society's first Sex Offender' reviewed reasonably favourably, and I see he's also written 'The Violent Abuse of Women in 17th and 18th century Britain' - 'Corporal Punishment of Women' is on offer on all the mainstream internet dealers' sites, it's evidently not just under-the-counter-porn. I guess Praefectus Praetorio would have enjoyed them - though he seemed pretty knowledgeable about the subject anyway, I think he could have written them!
Click to expand...
I've just had a look at Geoffrey Pimm. "The Corporal Punishment of Women" is self-published through Amazon's print-on-demand subsidiary, so not really a mainstream publication. I have however found an ebook version of his Samuel Pepys book. That one seems to dwell quite a lot on the flogging of women in 17th century Britain, rather more than the subject matter and title would suggest.:

It would be more than the smells of seventeenth-century London that twenty-first century Britons would find repugnant. Everyday sights would also revolt modern sensibilities. This was a time when the punishment for almost any crime that did not carry the death sentence was corporal in nature and was invariably administered in public. Whipping of both sexes with a cat o’ nine tails and branding or boring through the tongue with a red-hot iron were high on the tariff, together with the maiming of the nose or the amputation of ears. As if these penalties were not sufficiently cruel, they were often coupled with the unfortunate recipient spending several hours trapped by the neck and wrists in the pillory or by the ankles in the stocks. Thus the sufferer was obliged to stand for as many hours as the sentence demanded, their heads exposed to whatever the mob cared to hurl at them. These missiles might be relatively harmless, rotting fruit and vegetables being a favourite choice, or if the felon was unpopular, they might equally well have been rocks and stones and deaths are recorded as having ensued from a bombardment of this sort. Refinements in the cruel application of this punishment included the nailing of the culprit’s ears to the board. At the end of the period of suffering, the ears were either slit to free them from the nails, or amputated altogether.

The seventeenth-century poet John Taylor, writing in 1630, describes the necessarily extensive provision of the facilities required to inflict these punishments upon the hapless miscreants of London: ‘In London, and within a mile, I ween, There are jails or prisons full eighteen, And sixty whipping-posts and stocks and cages.’

The execution of felons was effected either by public hanging, or in the case of male traitors, by hanging, drawing and quartering (unless you were nobility, in which case you were mercifully decapitated!): ‘This morning, Mr. Carew was hanged and quartered at Charing Cross – but his quarters by a great favour are not to be hanged up.’ (Diary 15th October 1660)

Female traitors were merely burned alive, but it was not necessary to be a female spy to incur this penalty – plotting to murder one’s husband was prosecuted as ‘petit treason’. The penalty for men involved the cutting down of the miscreant whilst still alive, before disembowelling and then burning the still-warm entrails under the nose of the victim. The trunk was then dismembered and beheaded and the gory components exhibited in various parts of the city.(...) Difficult though it might be to believe now, these events were seen as great public entertainment and have been described elsewhere as ‘the pornography of the age’. (...)

In the diary, Pepys never mentions joining the baying crowds salivating over the bloody flogging of half-naked men and women, an everyday occurrence in his day, often administered with excessive cruelty. The notorious seventeenth century Judge Jeffries, having sentenced a woman to be publicly whipped, famously instructed the hangman to: ‘… pay particular attention to this lady. Scourge her soundly, man. Scourge her till the blood runs down. It is the Christmas season; a cold season for madam to strip in. See, therefore, man, that you warm her shoulders thoroughly.’ (...)

What [Mrs Aynsworth] had been at Cambridge was a procuress who had been publicly whipped out of town at the cart’s tail by the university authorities in punishment for her wicked ways. She subsequently took over the Rein Deer Inn at Bishop’s Stortford, where, despite having driven her out of Cambridge under the sting of the lash, the Vice-Chancellor and some heads of colleges stayed on their way to London and where they were ‘nobly entertained’. (...)

Any deviation from the proscribed norm in terms of sexual behaviour might bring down the full weight of the law upon the unfortunate woman‘s head. There was clearly a universal perception (at least among men) that women who were sexually promiscuous deserved a flogging, a remedy prescribed and applied from Biblical times. Neither did women have to engage in prostitution to suffer the painful consequences. Women whose only crime was to engage in a sexual liaison outside marriage were considered fit to be whipped. The following anonymous verse was found on a piece of paper in the Essex Assizes Michaelmas Sessions Roll for 1583 – whether it is by the hand of a slighted lover or a jealous wife is a matter of conjecture:

Here dwelleth an arrant bichant whore
Such one as deserves the cart
Her name is Margaret Townsend now
The horn shows her desert.

(The reference to the cart refers to the fact that public whippings were often carried out with the victim being dragged through the streets tied to the tailboard of such a vehicle whilst the lash was applied, considered to be a more severe punishment than a whipping at the post. The magistrate would specify the route to be taken – the longer the journey, the more severe the punishment. Some routes could take an hour or more to complete.)

In the days before any form of reliable birth control, the results of any illicit unions were often only too plain to see. The Quarter Sessions of Devonshire in 1598 ordered that all mothers of bastard children should be whipped and this soon became common practice throughout the country. The Puritans tried to eliminate all situations where the sexes might encounter temptation by banning pageants and all forms of entertainment, including dancing and the theatre, both of which were considered inventions of the devil. Once respectably married, a woman’s husband replaced her father in governance: ‘Teach her to live under obedience, and whilst she is unmarried, if she would learn anything, let her ask you, and afterwards her husband.’ (Sir Ralph Verney 1613–1693 ‘At Home’)

Whatever money or belongings she owned became the property of her spouse, whom she had promised to ‘love, honour and obey’. If she failed or refused to obey her husband, he was legally entitled to beat her until she complied with his wishes, colloquially with a stick no thicker than his thumb: ‘A dog, a woman, a walnut tree; the more they’re beaten the better still they be.’ (1670 J. Ray – English Proverbs) (...)

Shoplifting was first designated a crime in the seventeenth century and often involved women stealing readily concealed items such as lace, gloves, ribbons etc. which could be easily sold. Penalties were harsh however – thefts of as little as a couple of shillings (10 pence) would result in a public whipping, and anything of greater value in seven years transportation to the colonies or even death by public hanging. Of course, the alternative living available to women was to join the oldest profession and many did. (...)

Church going and religious observance of Sunday was a serious matter in Pepys’ day and infringements could be severely punished. For example, on Sunday, 30th April 1690, a married Durham woman named Eleanor Wilson was found to be intoxicated in church and as a result, was publicly stripped to the waist and whipped at the post on the following market day between the hours of 11.00 and 12.00 noon. (...)

The most successful of Pepys’ maids, and the one who appears in the very first diary entry, is Jane Birch, who was [XX] years old at that time. Pepys shows her to have been an affectionate, emotional, brave, stubborn, humorous, high-spirited and hard working girl, all of which was rewarded with a wage of just three pounds a year and an occasional whipping. She stayed with the Pepys’ for three years, in spite of the fact that she was not always treated well: ‘This morning, observing some things to be laid up not as they should be by the girl, I took a broom [i.e. a birch] and basted [i.e. thrashed] her till she cried extremely, which made me vexed, but before I went out I left her appeased.’ (Diary 1st December 1660) (...)

Apart from sexually interfering with the maids, Pepys thrashed both his male and female servants as and when he thought they warranted it:

… hearing from my wife and the maids’ complaints made of the boy, I called him up, and with my whip did whip him till I was not able to stir. (Diary 21st June 1662)

Thence to my brother’s, and there told him how my girl has served us which he sent me, and directed him to get my clothes again, and get the girl whipped. (Diary 21st August 1663) (...)

Both public and private morals had been scrutinised under the Puritans and in 1650, the ‘Act for the Suppression of the Detestable Sins of Inceste, Adulterie & Fornication’ had prescribed that couples found guilty of such offences should be publicly whipped and branded (although in practice the male party often escaped with only a financial penalty). (...)

It begins to appear that, as is often suspected to be the case in our own day and age, there was one rule for the rich and another for the poor. This was certainly so in seventeenth-century England; in May 1681 the Duke of York intervened to save the Lady Sophia Lindsay from being publicly whipped through the streets of Edinburgh, to which she had been sentenced as a punishment for assisting in the escape of her father-in-law, the Earl of Argyle, who was facing a charge of treason. Instead, she was saved the public humiliation (but not the pain) by being privately birched by the Sergeant-at-Arms in a room in Edinburgh Castle. (...)

In seventeenth century England, marriage and sexual morals played a far more important social role than they do now, with a family centred around a married couple representing the basic social unit. Society was still strongly influenced by strict Puritan values; publicly inflicted corporal punishment awarded by ecclesiastical courts for adulterous relationships had only been abolished in 1641, but moral lapses still continued to be prosecuted by the civil courts; at Hastings in 1669, one George Laby was ordered to pay half a crown (12½ pence) per week maintenance for his illegitimate child whilst the mother, a servant girl named Anne Perk, was sentenced to be stripped naked upwards from the waist and publicly flogged at the whipping post as a punishment for her lewd behaviour. (...)

Jinny (maid) Surname unknown 1663: Ran away the day after she was employed, taking her new clothes with her. She was apprehended and Pepys arranged to have her whipped in the Bridewell: ‘Thence to my brother’s, and there told him how my girl has served us which he sent me, and directed him to get my clothes again, and get the girl whipped.’ (Diary 21st August 1663)

It certainly looks like judicial punishment of women is a speciality of the author, so I would be very interested to see his book dedicated exclusively to that subject. However, not sufficiently so to pay the exorbitant print-on-demand price at Amazon.
 
Venom said:
Manda Scott’s 3,000-page epic Boudica, conveniently separated into four consecutive tomes, tells the story of Celtic noblewoman Breaca, who rose up against Roman occupation and received the eponymous title “Bringer of Victory”. Of course, one biographical key scene is not amiss, either: After the death of her husband Breaca is brutally flogged by order of the Roman tax collector.



Not yet. This is the beginning. The rest will be worse; don’t bring it sooner.

She could not imagine worse. This much was more than she could bear. She opened her mouth and breathed in hot, sweating air and---

Not yet.

She closed her mouth and choked on sweat and old spit and somewhere, somebody laughed and she remembered that they could see her and for a moment, she took the weight on her legs, not her arms, and pressed her forehead to the oak and made the feel of it count against the stunning, blinding, nauseating, endless, endless, endless pain.

A blaze of lightning struck her arms, above her head, and she forgot about her weight and slumped against the ties and the lightning struck her back again, adding pain to infinite pain and the oak was gone and all sense of safety and she opened her mouth and took a breath---


The flogging is almost entirely depicted from Breaca’s point of view, and in a somewhat detached style as she drifts in and out of visions of a shamanic entity that guides her through her battles.

The novel sports a very captivating writing style and an enormous supply of historical knowledge, especially when it comes to Roman military. As to be expected with the choice of the protagonist, the story incorporates feministic motifs throughout its unfolding. However, the women are strong in their own rights, not being elevated by turning every male counterpart into a misogynistic villain or an incompetent fool. Come to think of it, there’s almost no character without some interesting or redeeming qualities about him or her – apart from the misogynistic, incompetent tax collector.
Click to expand...
i see 4 books do you know which book it is in
 
elephas said:
View attachment 1182580
Savage Eden
By Constance Gluyas
(1976)
Part I. London, 1700
Chapter 1
(1)
View attachment 1182563View attachment 1182564View attachment 1182565View attachment 1182566View attachment 1182567View attachment 1182568View attachment 1182569View attachment 1182570View attachment 1182571
Click to expand...
I love this story. Carolyn--a noblewoman who should be exempt from the painful and humiliating punishments meted out to commoners--is to be punished as a lowly commoner and a slut, doing a sexy topless and barefoot dance under the lash as she sings, in front of hundreds of onlookers.
 
"It is also likely that he refused
because he perceived the naked exposure of the bodies as an excellent means to
control the female inmates. Statements by former female inmates of the St. Ann
workhouse demonstrate most clearly that women felt extremely degraded by having
parts of their body exposed to the gaze of the officers and that they tried to behave
well in order to avoid extra time on the mill."

"Eleanor Mead's mistress had 'ordered her to be conveyed
in her naked and exposed state to the bilboes, by two men, herself walking behind.'"

And much more in:
 
Last edited:
the fair ladies of the Roman Empire exceeded their breth-
ren in the ingenuity they displayed in inventing trivial
excuses for subjecting their serving-women to excruciat-
ing punishments. In many cases the anger resulting
from personal disappointments, or occasioned by
fancied slights, found its outlet in the subjection of
the serving-maids to punishment and degradation.
Almost every lady’s boudoir, like the judicial chamber
of the court, was decorated with an array of whips
and other devices for punishment and torture; and so
strongly anticipated was the inevitability of punishment
that in some instances the serving-maids were com-
pelled to strip themselves naked before attending to
their mistresses’ wants so that they were actually ready
for immediate scourging in accordance with the whims
of these tyrannical ladies. Even neglect on the part of
their husbands- was sometimes the cause of a slave-girl
being soundly flogged.


Continue here:
 
Chuckbruder said:
A story I wrote today, for your enjoyment.

Behavior Modification

Sharon had been declared mentally unstable due to her misbehavior and violence. Her parents sent her to a private asylum for women and girls to undergo behavior modification therapy.

She was a pretty girl, tall and slender with black hair in short braids. She had a combative temperament that required strict supervision. So began a series of attempts to reign her in.

In short she would endure harsh spankings in the punishment room. A burly, older man, Bruno, would take her to task. The room was equipped with furniture for binding the women and girls—a trestle, spanking bench, tripod and whipping post. A variety of spanking implements hung along hooks on the wall—straps, heavy wood and leather paddles, cat-o-nine tail whips, riding crops, canes, etc.

Sharon was brought in cursing Bruno. She struggled. He held both wrists firmly in front of him. He looked into her lovely green eyes and told her how he was going to punish her. She was not intimidated one bit. It would be a test of wills—but one that he would win.

He pulled her over to a heavy trestle with straps to bind to firmly. He expertly pushed her over and secured her wrists and knees, then a big strap up over her lower back. Her short tunic was gathered up and tucked up under the big strap. Her white cotton bikini panties were drawn down to her knees. She had a very nice bottom. He would enjoy punishing those buttocks.

Next came the scolding and lecture as he selected a heavy strap from a hook. She just continued to curse him. He just laughed. He explained that she would suffer for her constant misbehavior and defiance.

Thus it began. Over the next hour he punished her. Hard spanking of her young athletic buttocks with a variety of implements—the strap, a riding crop, a paddle, etc. He knew how to inflict pain this way. He knew that her punished buttocks would recover for yet another session with him, so he spanked them hard and long.

It took a while, but in time he broke her will. Her pain and agony could be seen in the distortion of her face, her outcries, her wailing, and tears; and the bruising and stripping of her buttocks. She struggled in her bonds, but to no avail. She clinched her buttocks to no avail. He showed her no mercy, just hard spanking punishment for this very bad girl. He scolded her now and again. Saying that she would get more of the same in the future.

She eventually she turned her pained, tear-stained face to him and called him a bastard. He just laughed.
Click to expand...
Part 2.

Bruno met with Dr. Phyllis Ward about further treatment for Sharon. The girl’s behavior had not improved and warranted another session of discipline. Phyllis indicated that in addition to spanking therapy, a “forced orgasm” therapy should be integrated with the use hard spanking with a paddle.

Sharon’s history indicated that she was sexually repressed, a virgin, and no experience with being masturbated by a partner. There has been prior success with other patients in combining the two therapies.

So, we find Sharon in the punishment therapy room bound naked to the heavy wood tripod. She had been gagged with a cloth gag. The bolster had been raised above hip level to allow Bruno to stimulate her vulva and clitoris, and breasts, while spanking the girl’s lovely athletic buttocks. The doctor would be there to supervise the sequencing of the two therapies. In addition, a guest from the Board of Supervisors, who was a major donor, would be observing the proceedings through a one-way mirror window. The man often came to see these sessions.

The behavior modification started as before with a litany of the girl’s misbehavior and other reasons for her punishment. As the doctor spoke, Bruno took down a short thick paddle from a hook on the wall. He was looking forward to punishing Sharon again. The bruises on her buttocks had all but disappeared, so they knew that they could sustain significant punishment.

It began with paddling only. Moderate swats, but painful to Sharon. She winced with each blow. The doctor then explained that Bruno would be masturbating her, as part of her therapy. Sharon’s eyes showed her disbelief. She was no stranger to playing with herself, but the idea of Bruno doing that was obviously shocking.

Bruno started with the girl’s breasts, small but perky. Sharon looked away. The doctor explained that they would stimulate her private parts during the discipline in order to induce a significant orgasm. The hope would be that intense pleasure along with intense pain would serve to help lessen misbehavior over time. Sharon looked back at the doctor with hate in her eyes. The doctor told Bruno to proceed, as they had planned. The doctor then sat to observe Bruno at work.

After fondling the breasts, gently, for a while, Bruno put his hand on her vulva and began to gently massage the clitoris. The doctor came up with a bottle of personal lubricant and told him to apply it liberally. He did, then resumed the initial part intended to make the girl cum.

Next, he inserted his middle finger of that hand up into Sharon’s vagina and pressed his palm against her vulva and clitoris. He resumed paddling her, harder this time. As he did, he shook his hand in a way to stimulate a sexual response. It did not take long to see that she was having an orgasm. The doctor told him to stop paddling as Sharon experienced what was clearly a huge long orgasm.

So, they continued the alternation of hard spanking of the girl’s buttocks, which became deeply bruised, and sexual stimulation. Sharon seemingly experienced four or five orgasms. But also had experienced pain. Agony showed on her face and tears flowed while she was being paddled.

Bruno left the room while the doctor talked with Sharon to explain what was expected in terms of improved behavior and promises of addition discipline with and without a sexual component.

Would the girl learn to behave? Not sure.

What about the donor? You can guess what he was doing while Sharon was suffering hard paddle swats. Watching her pained expressions, the desperate clenching and unclenching of her buttocks, her body thrusting up against the bolster, and the progressive coloring of her poor buttocks to a deep purple, as Bruno beat them again and again. He left the premises with a smile on his face and extensive white stains on his tie and the vest of his three piece suit.
 
A text from 1230 CE from Gujarat shows that not just customers, but also
owners could use violence to coerce their slave girls. It was legal to “punish her by
kicking and catching her by the hair and tying up and beating her.”660 If a prostitute
refused a customer after a service agreement was made, she could be fined eight
times her fee unless the king was involved, then the punishment increased to 1000
lashes.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
GURU12 said:
A text from 1230 CE from Gujarat shows that not just customers, but also
owners could use violence to coerce their slave girls. It was legal to “punish her by
kicking and catching her by the hair and tying up and beating her.”660 If a prostitute
refused a customer after a service agreement was made, she could be fined eight
times her fee unless the king was involved, then the punishment increased to 1000
lashes.
Click to expand...
Thanks for posting that - it's a very interesting, and well-written, thesis. I've copied your post into our Roman Resources thread, it certainly qualifies - see my note there about the contents: https://www.cruxforums.com/xf/threads/roman-resources.2675/post-740983
THE SLAVE TRADE OF EUROPEAN WOMEN TO THE MIDDLE EAST AND ASIA FROM ANTIQUITY TO THE NINTH CENTURY
 

Donna by Dr. Gerda Mundinger , is there whole text available ;​

fragment:

“One of her favourites was a woman in her early forties. She was a little too plump and had a massive behind, but her flesh was firm and her skin silken smooth.



Their game never varied. They would sit in the woman's living room and chat over a drink; then when the woman was ready, she would tell Donna.



Donna's smile would vanish then to be replaced by a stern, almost cruel, expression as she became the headmistress of a private school while the woman reverted to the role of refractory student.



Donna would upbraid her for her conduct and bad manners, then announce that she was to be caned on the bare behind as punishment.



Scolding the woman, Donna would order her to raise her dress and slip to her waist and hold them there as she walked, with Donna following, to her bedroom.



There, Donna would sit and lower the woman’s panties, take her over her lap and spank her bare behind a warm shade of pink while the woman cried and pleaded for mercy.



But the spanking was only a warm-up to set the tone of the session. While the woman stood sobbing and rubbing her tingling buttocks, Donna would go on scolding her as she slowly undressed, stripping naked except for garter belt, nylons and shoes.



She would order the woman to produce her cane, a long, thin, very whippy one and the woman would kneel to present it to her, her eyes wet with tears, her voice girlish as she begged Donna not to cane her, offering to perform various sexual tributes on her instead, acts such as cunnilingus and anal licking and osculation.



“Yes, Nancy,” Donna would reply, coldly, “you will suck my cunt and tongue my arsehole, but that will be after I have striped your chubby arse with my cane. Kiss my cunt now; then get on your feet,” she would snap in that cruelly cold tone.



Trembling, the woman would press a gentle and ardent kiss to her vulva, then get to her feet, her big breasts swaying, tears trickling down her cheeks.



Tapping the woman lightly on one hip with the cane, Donna would have her bend over the back of a chair and grip the arms with both hands.

“What a big, fat behind you have, Nancy,” she would comment. “It will require many strokes with the cane to stripe it properly. At least twenty.”



While the woman sobbed and pleaded, Donna ran her hands over the smooth cheeks and ordered Nancy to spread her feet wider apart.



“That's it, Nancy, now while I amuse myself by beating your big arse with my cane, I'll be able to look at your cunt, too. Oh yes, Nancy, you do show your cunt when you bend over like this. See how your big tits are dangling. I'm going to make them bounce with my cane, starting right now.”



She delivered the first flick of the cane with a hissing swish and drew an agonized cry from her naked victim.



“My, that did sting, didn't it? What a lovely red line it drew across your fat cheek. Have another, dear… and another.”



She administered the first ten strokes quickly, the abruptly changed her style and teased the woman, touching lightly with the cane, running it up her inner thighs and in her crotch, then flicking it in another stinging stroke, biting the tender flesh of her ample buttocks cruelly, never breaking the skin, but making her buttocks a network of fiery red lines, keeping her crying victim dancing, her behind bouncing, her plump, white breasts swaying madly as the cane swished again and again.



The number of strokes was never announced before the punishment began, but it always was between twenty and twenty-five and as Donna announced the end of the caning, the woman would leap erect and rub her red streaked, stinging buttocks with both hands, her big breasts flapping wildly.



By then, Donna was invariably so wildly aroused that she would permit the woman to go on with her dance while she slipped a finger into her crotch and induced an orgasm.



After that, she would pick up the cane again and threaten the woman with another twenty strokes unless she performed cunnilingus on her. Pretending she did not want to do it, the woman would kneel, tearfully, and press her mouth to Donna's vulva.”
 
Here's a short story that I'm sure fits into this thread too...
Following is the beginning and then the link to the full story:

A Public Flogging
A short story about the punishment of two women in earlier times to an old but still impressive drawing by Zerosen with three additional image sections. The events are initially observed by a young man who is enthusiastic about the younger victim. Then there is a change of perspective to the view of a young widow as the second victim.

public flogging - by Zerosen.jpg

1. - Anna

Excited, I walk into the city and through the streets. Two beautiful women are to be publicly whipped for their crimes today. It begins with a humiliating performance as the sinners are dragged through the city streets in chains, barefoot and clad in rags.

I hear excited people; I push my way through the crowd with strong arms; I am tall enough to look over most heads. Suddenly I see the two sinners in front of me, I hear their ankle chains rattling over the cobblestones. My eyes first fall on a young woman with tousled long hair and a hunched back, but with a certain grace and barely concealed beauty. The other is a little older, not quite as pretty, but certainly attractive; she is marked by fear and sadness.

I hear angry abuse from the crowd and I think to myself, "Isn't it enough for people that these women are flogged for their crimes?"

The two women are dragged away by guards on ropes which are tugging at their bound hands. Their path leads to the great market square and I follow them, accompanied by the clinking of their ankle chains on the cobblestone street. There, in the marketplace, a platform with two whipping posts has been erected for their punishment. Guards drag the two sinners upstairs, when they reach the top their hands are untied and the women are forced to undress in a shameful manner and in full view of all. Arms and hands are still trying to cover their boobs and nakedness, but helpers drag the sinners to the prepared posts, where they are tied securely - with their backs to the post! Their legs are spread between boards with holes. The wood closes, fear and deep shame fill the faces of the two victims, but the audience is filled with enthusiasm and anticipation.

I am excited too and delighted to be able to see the two women fully naked and front on, far more than I could have expected. I stare at their breasts, the younger one has amazing perky tits with big buds, the other has big heavy boobs that bend a little under gravity.

The long walk in the morning was worth it for me, I enjoy this sight. I can even see both girls' pussy clearly, the board between their feet forcing them to keep their legs open. A great idea whipping these gorgeous women from the front, I think to myself.


And here is the link to the full story:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom