Photo #3 from 1837 shows the Boulevard du Temple by Mr Daquerre. The exposure time is 14 hours, so no people or vehicles are visible. Photo #5 from 1826 by Mr Niepce, probably the oldest photo in the world, which was exposed for 10 hours, shows an official at the window. Strangely, he is visible.From the beginnings of photography
View attachment 1485721 View attachment 1485722 View attachment 1485723 View attachment 1485724 View attachment 1485725
Perhaps in days gone by but I prefer the edges of heat vision, night vision and drone technologyA linkie taking cover from her hunters?
The last is dunes on Mars and the others are still curiosities I can not fathom.
I think finding a good tree, one on the edge of the woods, with good strong branches. Then, tie your hands to a branch over head, leaving you on your toe tips. Leave you there for a while, in sight of anyone who happens to come by...My arms up, waiting for you to decide what I deserve
View attachment 1485611
Sounds quite erotic and arousingI think finding a good tree, one on the edge of the woods, with good strong branches. Then, tie your hands to a branch over head, leaving you on your toe tips. Leave you there for a while, in sight of anyone who happens to come by...
Henry Fox-Talbot's window is claimed by some for that title:Photo #3 from 1837 shows the Boulevard du Temple by Mr Daquerre. The exposure time is 14 hours, so no people or vehicles are visible. Photo #5 from 1826 by Mr Niepce, probably the oldest photo in the world, which was exposed for 10 hours, shows an official at the window. Strangely, he is visible.
If you're refering to pic 2 & 4, then probably most of the males on the planet would likely agree with you.The last is dunes on Mars and the others are still curiosities I can not fathom.
The raven pics are also nice!
Beats letting the old castles crumble,Oh yes, it's a very up-market hotel, favoured by the rich and famous, on the bonnie, bonnie banks of Loch Lomond. There was a dreadful fire there not long ago, it's good to know it's been restored and is back in business.
And while we're preserving and restoring those charming old castles, let's not forget to include those fun spaces underneath them.... for their historical significance of course.Beats letting the old castles crumble,
Beats letting the old castles crumble,
It's not really an ancient castle - though I suppose by US standards it's oldish - I think it was first built in the 1700s, and rebuilt more than once (it seems to have been fire-prone, no doubt they had carelessAnd while we're preserving and restoring those charming old castles, let's not forget to include those fun spaces underneath them.... for their historical significance of course.![]()